Removed by mod
The dubvee.org instance is going to ban you for this comment.
Who?
Are you gonna?
If I was that persons attorney I would advise them not to answer this question
I would as well, but I’m not entirely certain that answering it would be a crime. Stating that you will shoot someone in self defense, or community defense, especially when that person is violating several Federal Laws with their current actions, should be legal for all intents and purposes. That is literally advocating for law and order.
Yeah, he wasn’t advocating that individuals kill national guard troops, but that the governments of the invaded states should.
Yep, raise up militia and rally the national guard of the invaded states. Makes the statement more direct as well as being more effective overall, also harder to spin as being random murders.
We had to do it last time this asshole was president to prevent them from stealing PPE for Jared’s buddy.
Pls do
So the blue states don’t have a National Guard to respond?
It’s a scenario that was so concerning to Washington state Rep. Sharlett Mena that she introduced legislation that would make uninvited deployments of out-of-state troops illegal. Her bill cleared a committee last week and has the backing of Democratic Gov. Bob Ferguson, who pushed for the proposal in his inaugural address last month.
…
But, as she noted to her colleagues last week, if Trump were to federalize National Guard units, there’s nothing the state could do to prevent it; a presidential order preempts state authority.
Hey member in Iraq War II when we were losing a bunch of soldiers and instead of throwing more in or thinking about a draft they just sent over the National Guard?
the National Guard. Who . . .were supposed to be guarding the nation?
Anyway. Just in case some of you were not alive to remember that.
Party of statea rights
Missouri goes into East St.Louis. They get robbed and have to walk back home.
Organize and arm your community.
Both sides are partially right. This bill is a dog and pony show. Federal law trumps (pun intended) state law. So this law is not really enforcable. And the blue gov can always order his guard to defend the state. Even if the administration federalizes them. Nothing really stops him. So the law doesn’t change much. But it does bring the idea into the news. And for the actual nation guardsmen from red states, it will sow doubt as to which laws they are supposed to follow. For the ones in the blue states it will help move some who might reject fighting other US troops into doing so if ordered. So it just moves the needle a little bit if such a thing were to happen. But it won’t. The administration knows some guardsman would refuse orders on both sides. And that would set an example for federal troops to do the same. So it would weaken them. And they have more than enough illegals to to deport already. They don’t need to trade control for more people to deport. Maybe in 3 years it might be a trade they see as valuable if other factors come into play relating to the next election.
Nice.
- said the nazi filth.
I can assure you I am anything but whatever thoughtless slur that slithers from your thoughts.
Your unelected fuhrer is the one who sieg heil salutes in public.
What else would you be?
