CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoDeepSeek might not be as disruptive as claimed, firm reportedly has 50,000 Nvidia GPUs and spent $1.6 billion on buildoutswww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up128arrow-down110cross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
arrow-up118arrow-down1external-linkDeepSeek might not be as disruptive as claimed, firm reportedly has 50,000 Nvidia GPUs and spent $1.6 billion on buildoutswww.tomshardware.comCharlesDarwin@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square4fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
minus-squareCharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 years agoHuh, well imagine that. The truth is more complicated than the initial hype.
minus-squarefallowseed@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·2 years agodoesn’t that make their releasing it as open-source even more of a gift? :P
minus-squareCameronDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoUnless their goal was shorting the affected tech stocks. They were a financial firm originally right?
minus-squareCharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoI guess. Although Meta does the same, and I’m not sure of the motivations.
Huh, well imagine that. The truth is more complicated than the initial hype.
doesn’t that make their releasing it as open-source even more of a gift? :P
Unless their goal was shorting the affected tech stocks. They were a financial firm originally right?
I guess. Although Meta does the same, and I’m not sure of the motivations.