Summary

Meta’s Instagram faced criticism after searches for “Democrat” or “Democrats” displayed a “results hidden” message, while “Republican” returned 3.3 million posts.

The issue emerged after Donald Trump’s inauguration, which Meta owner Mark Zuckerberg attended.

Meta attributed the problem to a technical error affecting political hashtags and promised a quick fix.

Critics, however, flagged concerns over perceived political bias, especially as Meta has recently shifted content moderation policies and aligned closer to the Republican administration, including donations to Trump and appointing a Republican as global affairs chief.

  • Orbituary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Tip of the iceberg. Even if this was a mistake, we don’t know what any engines are hiding if they don’t display results.

    • cnirrad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      The mistake was that they got caught. Going forward they will be sure to shadow ban any content the orange turd doesn’t want.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Threatening billionaires with jail apparently works. I wonder if it could be used to make them pay taxes.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    60
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh God, have we come full circle? 8 years ago this would be the same article but about how meta was blocking conservatives…

    • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      You mean the company that hired Cambridge Analytics to help Trump win the first time was censoring conservative sources? I don’t think so.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        3 months ago

        Why do people seem to think I’m saying that Meta was blocking conservatives? Are Lemmykins that bad at comprehension or are they too just egged along by the rage machine to the point where they can’t think clearly?

          • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            8 years ago this would be the same article but about how meta was blocking conservatives

            So comprehension then. Thanks!

            • zaph@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              IDK dog if this many people misunderstood my point I’d be trying better not doubling down on blaming them but you do you

              • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’m happy to accept that there are a lot of stupid people on Lemmy, particularly the politics communities.

        • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          Why do people seem to think I’m saying that Meta was blocking conservatives?

          Because your literal words were “the same article but about how meta was blocking conservatives.” Please tell the class how saying “meta was blocking conservatives” does NOT mean “Meta was blocking conservatives.”