• shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m the guy usually defending diplomatic talk. It’s nothing like how we talk and interpret one another’s words.

    OTOH, I’m screaming at world leaders to grow a pair.

    “Fuck around and find out you you little trust fund bitch. Please, fuck around.”

    High time the world stands up and says, “Nah. Fuck off America. We’ll take what comes.”

    Signed, an American.

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    ELI5 how is Trump any better than Putin? Both seem to be following the same playbook of intimidation and unlawful invasions, showing utter disrespect to international law.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s exactly what Putin wants. He wants the US to behave as he does so that he can say, “see? The US is no better than me.”

    • Peck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      There’s no such thing as international law. It’s free for all. If you have an army, you can also get what you want.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      He is not and the US isn’t any better than Russia in that regard. All caused by people with bruised egos playing with people’s lives.

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Gotta love having a president that has to be warned by allies NOT to invade other countries. This is SO great!

    Oh and since not everyone gets it…/s.

    • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      If the USA attacks another NATO country, article 5 requires that the rest of NATO all pile on. None of those countries could individually do much, but you’d be loosing hundreds of thousands of soldiers and trillions of dollars to possibly take an icy rock with a population of 56000. It’s fucking stupid.

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        …besides the fact that two of those other NATO members have nuclear weapons, which severely complicates matters.

          • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Depends on how the war goes. Nobody uses nuclear weapons as a first response but they’re always there as a reminder that if my country goes down, so does yours.

            Besides, intercontinental force projection becomes a lot more complicated when your opponent has the ability, theoretical or not, to sink entire carrier groups at once.

            I think it’d be more likely that Trump would get immediately kicked out of office if he actually managed to start a war with the EU. There’s a limit to how stupid the GOP is willing to be for him.

            Counterproductive policies that can be used to pocket some more money? Sure, why not. But a war that threatens to fuck the economy, dramatically curtail international trade, and probably hand global hegemony over to China? Too risky for too small a reward.

            • Peck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Lol. Time of carrier groups is over my friend. 100 cheap naval drones will make short work of that.

  • TingoTenga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    US will make a stupid move, Russia will make a stupid move, China will make a stupid move.