If CEOs legally must do what benefits the shareholders, than cutting millions in employment costs by swapping CEOs with AI is now their legal obligation
(Probably won’t happen, but I can dream!)
Absolutely untrue. The CEO has a fiduciary duty, not a “line always goes up” duty. They are expected to act in the best interests of the company. In other words, they won’t see legal issues unless they pull something in-your-face malicious.
My last CEO announced to the board, two years in a row, that we would purposefully be losing money to build our staff and products. They applauded.
TIL
deleted by creator
Klarna is evil
Good. I would think AI could handle scheduling & project management more efficiently & effectively than the greedy rats that CEOs tend to be.
