If you’re going to censor something, use an opaque black shape. These half-ass censorship attempts are ridiculous.

I need to see body camera footage, but their claim is that she had a butcher knife and approached an officer who was backed into a closet, all while carrying the infant.

This doesn’t seem like a simple “bad cop” moment.

Its possible: Link

I had to update a Chromebook-like machine that was running Windows not to long ago. It was excruciating. The restart progress bar on one update after reboot took ~30 minutes to reach 3%.

Keep in mind that the computer is unusable during this time, and all it takes is one poweroff to brick the machine. Ask me how I know :) . I had to leave it plugged in overnight to finish.

If this comment is referring to Windows reboots after update, I will call it confidently incorrect.

They have also had this issue open for 20 years.

And this amounts to just allowing the user to specify a different directory for Firefox on Linux (~/.mozilla is terrible).

Frankly unacceptable.

Blanket statements of a group are harmful.

Blanket, emotional statements are harmful.

this article does not attempt to compare the privacy practices of each browser but rather their resistance to exploitation.

The Madaidans article lacks relevance, we are talking about fingerprinting.

Last I recall, Vanadium lags behind customized-Firefox in privacy features, and even more behind the Tor Browser.

Having a tool like Noscript is absolutely necessary, with today’s browsers, if you want to fight fingerprinting.