Yes

18

Seems obvious. Boomers are racist but dont even know it. Millennials who are racist choose to be.

“held liable” means some bad press in ‘radical left’ media at this point, right?

Right on target! Keeping the masses uneducated is one of the main goals.

Except they arent. There are multiple clinical studies on this.

How ignorant do you have to be to believe people cant accurately describe not having actual images in their mind.

Its actually Looney Tunes @.@

Its almost funny because its behavior that some would shrug off like “dont bother with that man, hes old, bitter and senile, just ignkre him” if it wasnt the President of the fucking United States.

But your “actual endangerment” didn’t actually happen either? They ate weed gummies and had no demonstrable negative effects afterwards, according to the article. Why am I required to address your “potential harm” that never occurred while you get to ignore the other side?

Did it say that in the article? I would still consider non consensual drug consumption to be harm in any case, not to mention there may be negative aftereffects that are not immediately obvious.

Did you not just complain about being pedantic about wording immediately before this sentence?

True, but how was that about wording?

Anyway, I dont think were getting anywhere, we just seem to have different views about the harmfulness of some actions.

Jesus you guys are so pedantic with the wording. English isnt even my first language. Yeah, she actually endangered people. What I wanted to say is the endangerment didnt cause actual harm in that case. It doesnt make it right but its still much better than causing actual harm.

Also its not a strawman, I literally said “its like saying”, I made a comparison. A strawman argument would be if I pretended like you implied shooting someone in the leg is worse than driving a car.

You cited the possibility of greater harm as the reason for it being worse than actually causing lesser harm. I made an example where that obviously doesnt apply to make the point that the possibility of causing greater harm does not automatically make an action worse than an other.

Right. Changed it, doesnt really change the point though.

The (very obvious) difference is that she actually drugged caused kids eating edibles while only possibly endangering actually endangering but only possibly hurting people while driving.

Thats like saying driving in any state sober or not is worse than shooting someone in the leg because you can kill someone while driving but a shot in the leg isnt deadly.

Also, kids with their brains not completely developed arent “literally 100% fine” consuming THC, it can have very serious consequences. Heck, even adults can get seizures or psychosis from weed if theyre predisposed. You should get your stoner facts straight (not meant as an insult to stoners, I love weed).

I realized that from an other comment. Havent read the whole thing, admittedly. But “… which says she was …” sounded like you were assuming things.

Still not worse than drugging kids imo.

https://www.songfacts.com/lyrics/men-at-work/down-under

Thought this was a reference, not sure after not a single comment mentioned it…

The bigger problem is this loser was driving to and from school stoned.

How is that a bigger problem than drugging kids, are you serious?

And why are you even assuming your baseless theories as facts?

Nobody knows what magnets are. Except this guy.

Im not sure thats a better option. Dems ruled often enough and it never changed much. They are capitalists just as much, just less racist and narcissistic.

Sure, short term its the best option to prevent shitstains like Trump, but on the long run the Dems will fuck the population just as badly.

On the other hand, if both parties piss everyone off then the needle doesn’t move as the parties lose support in equal measure.

Isnt this exactly what I said?

Maybe this is actually good. If both parties keep behaving in the worst way possible for the population, maybe the US can finally rid itself from the two party system that keeps destroying the country.

Who am I kidding though, most people will keep voting for their party even when their house is literally set on fire by their representative. It will be something like 45/45 at best