Cyclist, Historical Fencer, Storyteller, occasionally dabbles in Commedia Del’Arte. I’m a bit complicated ;)
I don’t know, I’m an aircraft structural engineer and, based upon what technical commentary I did hear him make, it kinda sounds to me like he knows what he’s talking about.
I don’t know about the others, but Coast Guard gets paid regardless. These events justify their budget. It wasn’t an “extra cost” to the taxpayers.
A kid and a researcher who made regular trips to document the flora growing on the site.
The CEO was very careful to skirt applicable regulatory laws. He even called his passengers “crew members”. In the aviation world, I have some experience harmonizing multiple regulatory authorities. Because of “international waters”, there will need to be some agreement and harmonizing of regulations. There’s already SOLAS so, I think it can be done.
In the aviation world, an experimental aircraft may not be used for “compensation or hire”. The only exception is that a kitplane manufacturer is allowed to give demo flights.
I’ve been curious about going “both ways”, but never acted upon it… ;)
I gave Mastodon a look when Twitter started to get all “Musky”. I wound up going with Counter.Social in the end.
Having tried both, I think I prefer Lemmy
Golly, who could have imagined that some charismatic sociopath spreading conspiracy theories would feign remorse in court to reduce his sentence?
…and Cable TV didn’t eliminate commercials…and ATMs didn’t reduce banking costs resulting in higher interest on savings…etc…