Good lord. That dude’s packing a fire hose.

I think those two jets are kissing, though.

What is going on here?

I edited my comment and added a couple more points beyond that one. (Sorry, I know editing comments like that is bad etiquette.)

Sure someone can learn techniques and stuff, but if their genitals and/or naked body are not sexually attractive to you, or vice versa, that’s something that’s better to find out before getting the government involved.

Or if the things that turn you on turn him off or vice versa, that’s also something that’s better to know early.

So it’s not really about “bad” in bed. It’s whether what they like to do is something that satisfies you sexually, and whether what you like to do is something that satisfies them sexually.

I don’t know if that’s reasonable. If you’re only saying that to “filter out” people, then you’re going to filter out good people. But if a guy is being too pushy when you say you want to wait, you don’t need to lie about waiting for marriage to test him, just break it off because he’s being pushy.

You have to think of the potential that this person is not going to be able to please you sexually. If that’s something you’re cool with in a marriage, then yeah, that’s fine.

Speaking personally, that’s not something I would want to risk.

This is so intensely cringe.

I use Kubuntu for old hardware. It’s a pain to have to install Flatpak and Flathub every time, but once you do, it’s great.

Champagne.

Animal Crossing. Just seems like a nice relaxing life.

I don’t know for sure, but I’m guessing it’s a response to the proliferation of AI slop pet pics and videos on the internet.

Why do they have any Microslop software?

Gonna start a conversion camp for conservatives. They’ll come back a socialist. I guarantee it.

(Or, you know, they’ll come back pretending to be one because of the psychological torture.)

That’s the thing. If you pay people to figure it out, they will. It’s only through massive defunding that the IRS has become completely incompetent. They used to be quite good at their jobs.

Not yet, but hopefully soon. :)

That could potentially backfire on you:

https://sciactive.com/human-contribution-policy/#Reasoning

1. You could be including copyrighted code and not complying with its license.
2. You don’t own the copyrights to AI generated code.
3. The bugs and vulnerabilities AIs introduce are much harder to spot than in human authored code.
4. Your team might not understand the code that they’re submitting.

Etc.

AI slop clean up is the new highest paying job.

I run a tech company that doesn’t use any AI:

https://sciactive.com/human-contribution-policy/

We make an email service, and we have a hard stance against any AI in our product:

https://sciactive.com/2026/01/21/our-stance-on-ai-in-email/