minus-squareKBTR1066@kbin.socialtoNo Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Why aren't advertisers (Microsoft, Facebook, Google) held responsible for allowing scammy adverts?linkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 years agoOne of which is fraud. So yeah, this argument holds no water. The only reason this shit is allowed is money. There’s money to be made by allowing it. And money to be lost in preventing it. The end. linkfedilink
minus-squareKBTR1066@kbin.socialtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•I'm trying to prove a point. Without looking it up, what are these?linkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoIf you’ve seen “Cocktail”, they’re flugelbinders. linkfedilink
One of which is fraud. So yeah, this argument holds no water. The only reason this shit is allowed is money. There’s money to be made by allowing it. And money to be lost in preventing it. The end.