Infiltrated_ad8271

Don’t worry, surely instead of a service they will offer a product that works locally and allows you to control your data. /s

But not eris, ceres or haumea. It is surprising how many muricans are in this bizarre battle.

They are scammers who do not comply with the law, these unethical practices are minor things to them.

Actually, the librewolf installer for windows has included an updater for some time now.

Almost anything is better than just speculating while wasting power, but I’m not thrilled either if it’s for apps/spyware to deepfake and the like.

Thank you for thinking about accessibility. I am unable to see white text on a black background for more than half a minute, or end up seeing just a blur.

That’s why I liked hots, the capability to block chat from the start and for everyone.
It’s not really a problem in non-competitive modes, as people usually just use on-map alerts.

It’s probably a waste of time, but okay, I will be kind enough not to delve into your ignorant slander, delusions, straw men and ad hominems.

Since anti-abortionists don’t consider women as human beings possessing equal human rights (…) A right to life without right to agency is slavery. Do you understand that anti-abortionists want women to be slaves?

Let us come to the main issue. As I mentioned, this is a difference of importance, not all rights are equal and when there is a conflict one should prevail over the other. Although nothing is written it is easy in some cases, for example, the right not to be tortured is more important than the right to marry.

If for a moment you are able to consider the premise that fetuses are subjects of rights (say one of 42-week to make it easier), tell me, which is more important, the temporary and partial suspension of the right of agency or the right to life?
(I do not include slavery because I find it fucking absurd, as well as a trivialization of something very serious. You could have said something more coherent like reproductive freedom.)

This is not something like seeing the woman as property to be controlled, only considering the rights and interests of “both”. Let us also not forget that it is a self-imposed situation, and the cases in which it is “imposed by third parties” abortion is allowed all over the world.

Why do so many people find it so hard to understand the position of anti-abortionists and invent a fantasy about misogynist fascists?

To them fetuses are babies (which is correct at some point before birth, when is another debate) and therefore subjects of rights, so from their position they are defending a much greater right, the right to life. Essentially, from their perspective they are defending human rights, is it that hard for you to empathize with that?

It’s undeniable (unless you hate women)

Oh yep, you seem to have a flexible mentality, open to debate and not demonizing others, the opposite of what fascists typically do.

Individuals are solely responsible for their actions. If someone of the same sex, country or whatever does something wrong, it is not the duty of those who share an identity trait to take responsibility.

Try saying “it is unacceptable that blacks do nothing when other blacks commit crimes, they are also the problem and we must act against them”. It is discriminatory and disgusting, this article is hate speech.
It is particularly ridiculous that she acts as if she is part of the solution, encouraging others to “join in,” when she admits to doing the very thing she criticizes.

Combating sexism is a very serious matter that requires all of us to work together, but there are always people willing to double down on the sexist bet.