Alpha71@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoLadies and Gentlemen, the sate of AI.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1560arrow-down122
arrow-up1538arrow-down1imageLadies and Gentlemen, the sate of AI.lemmy.worldAlpha71@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 months agoSure, but AI didn’t say that. It said: XTX > XT, get XT.
minus-squareWrench@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoYep, my comment was tongue in cheek. It’s a useless result and only sort of makes sense as an overly reduced summary that has lost vital context. The other reply is the obvious answer. Each answer is from a different viewpoint from a different user.
Sure, but AI didn’t say that. It said: XTX > XT, get XT.
Yep, my comment was tongue in cheek. It’s a useless result and only sort of makes sense as an overly reduced summary that has lost vital context.
The other reply is the obvious answer. Each answer is from a different viewpoint from a different user.