• grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      26 days ago

      If there’s anything actionable about it, it would be collusion to crack down on any Chinese, local, or other AI implementations outside the crony circlejerk.

    • wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 days ago

      I dont think its that.

      I think they’ve all hit a performance wall behind closed doors, because the system behind LLMs is… Not up for the tasks ahead let’s say.

      Theyre going to use this to go to investors and say ‘see we can’t make targets, were now hamstrung’

  • kablez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    Here we go - they’re going to make open models and self hosting illegal and then demand we only get AI from approved American corporations. What a joke.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    26 days ago

    Whenever did any kind of voluntary regulations in industry and commerce actually benefit the people?

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        The European Systematic Risk Board? They are part of the European Central Bank. Not much of self-regulating here.

          • Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            25 days ago

            Ah, OK. That kind is not much regulating, actually. Or have you heard of them demanding serious penalties from someone?

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              25 days ago

              Nah they basically do their thing and nobody thinks about them anymore. They popped up as an industry reaction to people calling for censorship regulations, I think the last time they had any major problems was around 2013 when GTA V released and dumbasses being stupid about that and trying to push an adult rating.

  • VeryVito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    26 days ago

    Are we not calling it Super Intelligence Dash S.I. anymore? Really thought that was going to catch on…

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    26 days ago

    Any organisation that is permitted to regulate or investigate itself is intrinsically corrupt and unfit for purpose.

  • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    26 days ago

    “And the president said he plans to name an “AI czar” in the next three or four days.”

    It’s probably going to be fucking Kid Rock or some other unqualified Trump simping cronie.

  • auzy1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    One that doesn’t disadvantage them in any way, that can be ignored.

    Trump has no idea how AI actually works, and he likely didn’t get anyone else to check it

  • weps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    25 days ago

    it will be great the CEO’s said “winning” and Trump said they can police each other

  • TheFogan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    We’ve also decided to add a “pinky promise” layer to this agreement.

    You know what, considering that the world see’s AI on the same level of nukes. Maybe the iran war can be solved this way. Just give Iran a “morally binding” request to not build nukes. Declare that the new victory and end the iran war.