• adr1an@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    As much as I welcome this I can’t help but wonder, why do they care?

    Is it because it was the year of the Linux desktop? ;D

      • TheWilliamist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They may not have done well fiscally however I’ve been using a Lenovo ARM64 desktop and laptop for quite a while and my only pain points are the horrible, awful, type 4 printer support and having to hack around to get the shittastic VMware remote console (VMRC) to install.

    • RelativeArea1@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      AI, same thing why nvidia kinda went a bit loosy with their drivers on linux, windows is too limiting and freeBSD is apple’s main bitch.

      • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        apple has nevee meaningfully contributed to BSDs, they are just a disgusting leech, the reason why FreeBSD isnt as big is simply because Linux won the Unix wars that strongly

      • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        How do you figure FreeBSD is influenced by Apple? macOS and iOS don’t use FreeBSD. They use Darwin, which is a BSD fork, but not related to FreeBSD at all AFAIK besides they have some of the userland tools.

          • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            As someone who works for a company that develops FreeBSD kernel code, your doing an awful lot of conflating between BSDs. You’re basically saying that ChromeOS and Fedora are the same because they use the Linux kernel.

  • Quazatron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Qualcomm wants a piece of Nvidia’s server market pie.

    I expect the “support” is to ship some binary blobs in a open source wrapper at most, like Nvidia does.

  • utopiah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Late indeed but with the Frame already shipped running Arch and KDE on a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 it’s definitely going to be interesting.

  • dudeface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I was interested years ago potentially of a tablet form factor as a nice travel device

    Don’t think I care anymore