• obvs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    MacOS was so much better when Steve Jobs was in charge.

    Tim Cook REALLY made it worse. Steve Jobs made sure the user experience was generally good, although admittedly there were many times when he was pigheaded. On a personal level, Steve Jobs was a terrible person, but he made the operating system very good and very consistent.

    And Tim Cook didn’t care about any of that, and macOS is now SUPER inconsistent and much less user friendly. It’s still better than Windows, but MAN is it so so so much worse.

    • k0e3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I like the word inconsistent. It’s been over a decade since I stopped using macs — so I don’t remember exactly what it was that bothered me — but one of the biggest reasons why I stopped using macs was the inconsistency. Within the OS, between apps, between iOS and macos, etc…

    • pycorax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      At least he gave us some basic window management features. It’s still miles behind what Windows and Linux has unfortunately.

      • obvs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well that’s not correct.

        Engineers are great at developing a product.

        But having someone at the end who’s using the product and insisting on consistency because he’s anal-retentive and a pain in the ass will mean the product is consistent with the evaluator’s goals.

        macOS used to have a lot of underlying features that worked consistently no matter which app you were using, and Apple destroyed that.

        Either Jobs was having an effect, or it’s a damned strange coincidence that the severe reduction in consistency in macOS started just at the point that he died.