cantankerous_cashew@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agoSony, Warner sue Anthropic, alleging "blatant theft" of intellectual propertywww.axios.comexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up1280arrow-down12cross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
arrow-up1278arrow-down1external-linkSony, Warner sue Anthropic, alleging "blatant theft" of intellectual propertywww.axios.comcantankerous_cashew@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square13fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·7 days agobecause it was ruled to be a transformative work, like how someone making a video essay on a book/game/movie is (sometimes) not violating copyright.
minus-squareredditStinksSuperBad@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 days agoI saw this ruling and fully disagree.
minus-squareblockheadjt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 days agoSo if I modify someone else’s art and call it my own, the courts will respect this precedent and let me go?
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 days agoif you have enough lawyers and the art ia substantially different (different inteded use) they might
minus-square7101334@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 days agoYou got downvoted but this is just true lol (Fuck AI slop though)
because it was ruled to be a transformative work, like how someone making a video essay on a book/game/movie is (sometimes) not violating copyright.
I saw this ruling and fully disagree.
So if I modify someone else’s art and call it my own, the courts will respect this precedent and let me go?
if you have enough lawyers and the art ia substantially different (different inteded use) they might
You got downvoted but this is just true lol
(Fuck AI slop though)