• bitchkat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I have a theory that those sounds are what a baby naturally says as their start tgeir vocal journey. So we adapted the words we use to mean mother /father accordingly.

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      From everything I’ve read, that’s basically it. Babies get their linguistic start by just making babbling sounds “ba”, “ma”, “da”, etc, because they are easy to produce. We as adults attribute meaning to them, that meaning is reinforced for the infant, and then it is accepted.

      What I was curious about was why so many unrelated languages seem to use the “ma” sound for mother. If babies make random sounds and we assign the meaning to them, how did unrelated cultures agree on what each sound meant?

      There’s a section in this article that includes a suggestion of an explanation:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mama_and_papa

      Linguist Roman Jakobson hypothesized that the nasal sound in “mama” comes from the nasal murmur that babies produce when breastfeeding

    • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You might be on to something. There’s so many languages where the short word for mother is some variation of “ma”. Likewise with da/ba/pa for the father.

  • monotremata@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d like to point out that children do, in fact, get confused in this way.

    When my sister’s child (who now uses they/them pronouns) was quite young (maybe three years old? I’m not certain), when something upset them, they would say “oh no wha happen?” because they knew that when their parents responded with concern after they scraped a knee or something, they would always respond with “Oh no! What happened?” So even though the new situation didn’t rise to the level of provoking crying or whatever, because they wanted that same level of attention and concern, they just directly asked for that response. It was pretty cute.

    Similarly, when they wanted something to happen, they would ask it as a question: “want to make those guys talk?” (which meant “please make believe with me and provide voices for some of these stuffed animals”). Or “want to just bring the bowl down?” (which meant “I’m not sure which candy I would like! please bring the candy dish down so I can pick them by looking at them [and maybe take more than one]”). So they were definitely imitating things their parents said before understanding the full grammar of the situations involved.

      • monotremata@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeah! Same kind of thing. My sister’s kid would do it also for fairly minor things that had just become frustrating, like if they couldn’t get a container open, or the clothes wouldn’t fit on the Calico Critter, etc. They’d try, but then as they got frustrated, before they reached the point of actually crying about it, they would bring it over and present it to Dada and say “oh no wha happen!” And he knew he should give them his full attention as if they’d started crying, and comfort them in addition to solving the direct problem. It wasn’t grammatically sophisticated, but it was very effective communication.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    My niece refers to herself as “you” because she doesn’t understand that when people refer to her as “you”, that isn’t her name.

    She’s 27 years old…

  • zikzak025@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can’t remember where I heard this, but I believe the terms themselves evolved around common infant mouth sounds. Hence why so many languages use the term “mama” for mother.

    The baby makes random sounds, meaning is ascribed to them by the parents, the baby is given positive feedback and starts to make those sounds more frequently, and then the meaning eventually sticks for the child once they actually begin developing language.

    • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think it’s talking about parents who say “say daddy” to the baby. If the baby was just parroting back, they would say “say daddy” back, but if they just say “daddy”, then it implies that they know what “say” means

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think it’s trying to imply that Only a sociopath wouldn’t understand the mechanism.

      The guy in the picture is Dokes from the TV show Dexter. He’s the only one that recognized there was something wrong with Dexter.