• douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      11 hours ago

      They aren’t?

      They are buying up capacity from manufacturers who are stopping production of DRAM and pivot to HBM which is more profitable. Abandoning DRAM which affects a lot more than just “consumer grade RAM”

      • turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They’re publicly traded companies. Their investor meetings point out that HBM is not more profitable.

        It is in theory more guaranteed profit because it’s a smaller number of bigger contracts. But that’s the gamble they’re making.

        • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          But isn’t it kind of a game of chicken then for the consumer markets? Whoever gambles the other way, can win in both volume and availability, being able to cut the others off market just by pricing, enabled by the prior two points, get brand points by the ladle while at it, and kind of become a staple of the consumer market. When the bubble pops and others return, the market isn’t the same and everyone else sits at a disadvantage?

          • turmacar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Yes.

            Which is why it’s bad that the only 3 companies with capacity currently are colluding.