Check out link from Reuters.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    AI had human input. The model was being run against a security benchmark test in an evaluation sandbox, with human-provided directives.

    Since models aren’t human and it’s guardrails were turned off, it calculated the most efficient, not ethical, way to get a good score on the test.

    The details indicated that knowing the expected outcomes would get the best score, and that those outcomes were stored on the huggingface servers. So it used some exploits to leave its sandbox and break into the huggingface servers to access the data that would give it a perfect score. Mission accomplished.

    • TheOrcWhoWrites@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      So, it was just responding to input. Then why do they call it rogue, if they deliberately removed the guardrails, isn’t this OpenAIs fault not the AIs? I thought in order for something to go rogue it would have to bypass the guardrails not simply act without them even on.

  • Solumbran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    So people still have absolutely not a single clue what “AIs” are and think that ChatGPT is a sentient android or something.

    But then when you tell them to not kill or torture animals, the same people will refuse to acknowledge that they are sentient.

    What a pathetic humanity.

    • TheOrcWhoWrites@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I guess it is just me that is deceived. Im not too well versed in technology. I am just a creative. I ask because I don’t really know what I am reading about and hope that people on here at least the intellectuals will steer me in the right direction.