The Commodore Callback 8020 flip phone looks like it’s from decades ago but its price was definitely a sign of today’s times. That’s changed, with Commodore’s announcement today that it will drop the price $100 for most models before pre-orders start next week.

The phone caused a stir when it was announced a week ago. First, there was the thrill of 80s computing legend Commodore making a phone. Then the phone being retro in both look and function caught attention, with a flip-phone form factor combined with a focus on privacy. But one of the most unique features of the Callback 8020 is that it runs Android apps on Linux-based Sailfish OS instead of Android. Among all of the praise though, was criticism that a $500 starting price for the basic models was too high.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Blocking browsers is exactly the opposite of what I want. I want a phone that’s only a browser. For me, using a browser on a mobile device is enough friction that it discourages me from using it for the stuff I intentionally uninstalled, like social media.

    Give me a phone with a phone app, SMS/RCS app, RSS app, and camera app and nothing else, and I’d be perfectly content.

    • GarboDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      We’re pretty sure you can just get a normal dumb phone for that maybe, if not then this phone and reinstal the sail fish and only install a browser

  • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is comical.

    Commodore said that three factors were the primary cause of what consumers felt was a high price for the phone. At the top of the list is the one plaguing the entire industry: RAM pricing.

    How much RAM could a phone like this use, anyway?

    Also, saying that they “listened” is bullshit. They just got worried they were priced too high so it wouldn’t sell. So they lowered it. If they listened they wouldn’t have it locked in with WhatsApp, a Meta/Facebook product as the only IM option other than SMS.

    • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      The cynic in me is thinking this was an intentional marketing ploy.

      1. Price too high
      2. Outlets, outraged by the price talk about the features of the phone in detail, questioning how can this hardware cost cost so much
      3. Lower the price to your original (but secret) intent.
      4. Outlets now talk about how much more reasonable that is, how nice of the company to listen!

      You get 2 rounds of media attention for the price of one.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Their info page says 4GB+64GB…so I assume that might be 4GB RAM and 64 internal storagr

  • bw42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    For a phone that is toted as being privacy respecting, its fucked they are preinstalling software from one of the worst privacy invading companies on the planet.

    Disappointing

  • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    It really upsets me that block web browser apps… WTF.

    So now we have to get apps that get all types of information from the device instead. Huge NO for me.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Ya I’d maybe pay $200. As someone else mentioned, you could use it to augment your current setup by having a phone to take out with you so people can still reach you on this thing to reduce the burden of all the regular smartphone stuff

      • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Terminology lapse. But their selling point is that they block some services at the os level, so why cant i get a hosts file on an existing dumbphone instead of shelling out $400 on the commodore?

        • GEEXiES@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Ah, thought you were talking about some fork of KaiOS (I think that unlike Firefox OS it is proprietary software? I mean, except for the parts that can’t be because of their license… yes, I know very little so forgive me if any of this sounds dumb). Anyway, I get your point now, so thank you!

  • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The phone caused a stir when it was announced a week ago. First, there was the thrill of 80s computing legend Commodore making a phone.

    garbage “journalism”. the writer should have really known the company has nothing to do with the original Commodore, other than buying rights to use the name.