Does the title qualify this as a meme since it’s now recontextualized? Discuss, or perhaps refuse to again.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Person in red is dumb. Richard Dawkins himself has renounced the definition he set. Go read a book.

    By Richard Dawkins original definition, a smile is a meme. As is a high five.

    Ain’t nobody headed to c/memes to see a fucking high five, and red knows that.

    Red is a pedantic annoying dbag. Green set a firm boundary with an idiot and I commend them.

  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    I never understood this argument. If it’s wrong, it’ll get down voted. If it’s down voted people won’t see it.

    And if it’s not, then people are enjoying it so shut up.