Yes yes billionaire and all that, I mean going beyond his company and personal ethics. People talk about how he looks and acts in the moment as creepy or unsettling, feelings which other tech bros don’t seem to evoke. Why is that?
Yes yes billionaire and all that, I mean going beyond his company and personal ethics. People talk about how he looks and acts in the moment as creepy or unsettling, feelings which other tech bros don’t seem to evoke. Why is that?
You mean aside from making billions off of spying on people without their conscent? I guess its not as creepy that its publicly known, most of the data collection and targeted ad marketing was also predominantly children and teens. So i guess that excuses the other fact, that most of the targeted ads preyed on children and teens who showed signs of mental health symptoms. Its all good tho, its the world qe live in, errybody spying on errybody.
So breezing over all the known-knowns, how about the simple fact he has paid out billions of dollars of fines for breaking the law to continue spying on people.
Not what they asked
Nobody in the position of power he exists in can be judged solely off of appearance. We’ve all seen too many quotes and actions by him to judge without context.
Personally i can dissociate the guy i see on camera with a desk-name reading “M Zuckerberg” from the second hand stories i hear of ‘zuckerberg did this, zuckerberg did that’ and just focus on what the appearance and demeanour makes me feel.
I can’t not associate people with the knowledge I have about them.
So his behavior toward
otherscongress, lawmakers and shareholders, when he addressed every judicial and congressional hearing in front of a camera in an outward manner while being issued billions of dollars of fines for refusing to stop spying on people - doesnt meet the definition of demeanor? I mustve confused demeanor with whatever the wprd for, “behavior toward others : outward manner,” is?