The backpedaling is going full tilt
I wasn’t prepared for that. The views. Wow.
Unity: Disappointed to discover denying access to a document with legal standing to the affected parties could have legal implications, and now trying to make up a cover story.
There fixed it for you.
We removed it way before the pricing change was announced because the views were so low, not because we didn’t want people to see it.
If they actually wanted people to see, it like alluded to here, surely removing it wouldn’t be the best way of achieving that.
if you aren’t happy with my answer,
whose answer? It’s unprofessional to talk in the first person on a company account without a signature or byline telling you who the speaker is.
The best PR move for Unity at this point would be to fire their CEO. Preferably out of a cannon.
lol at choosing to present it in a way that implied there was no way to avoid the retroactive license change (which you explicitly said you wanted to apply retroactively, charging fees based on activity prior to your license change), then blaming the community for interpreting it how you told us it works.
I thought that earlier response was decent, at the very least it stopped them from sinking any further. This just pushes them further down. They could have just stopped talking about it, but a lousy pathetic excuse like that? There’s no hope for them.
