Cyberpunk 2077 is getting a mammoth-sized update, titled Update 2.0, tomorrow, September 21, and it promises to be a bit of a game changer. A police revamp, a progression overhaul, a new cybernetics system, vehicular combat, DLSS 3.5—it’s vast, and thankfully separate from the Phantom Liberty expansion due next week, so you’ll get all of this for free. With so many changes, the developer is naturally recommending that you experience it all on a fresh save, starting a new game rather than continuing an existing one.

It’s entirely possible to just carry on with an old save, but making a new character will ease you into all of the big changes, most notably the skill system, which might be a bit jarring if you have to rebuild an existing character. “Due to the number of changes, starting fresh will enhance your overall gameplay experience,” reads the tweet from CD Projekt Red.

Hey, chooms! While you’ll be able to continue the game with your current character on an existing save, we recommend starting a new game after @CyberpunkGame
Update 2.0. Due to the number of changes, starting fresh will enhance your overall gameplay experience!

  • flux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Hey gonks! Remember that game we released and was dirty as hell but you all gave up the eddies because we told you it was preem. We finally have the game we should have released just 3 years later. Go ahead and flatline your 200hr characters and reboot.”

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      If you got 200hours out of release then clear you got your moneys worth out of the game and enjoyed it, promises not kept or not.

      Personally the game could’ve been better but I certainly enjoyed the one 120ish hour playthrough I did and had no major issues other than some texture bugs or weird physics, I had a capable PC though not a last gen console trying to play at being modern.

      • anonono@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        31
        ·
        2 years ago

        by that definition you get your money’s worth of every movie you watch in the theater, the longer the better.

        it’s a shitty take.

        don’t pretend they didn’t screw up.

        • Primarily0617@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          2 years ago

          if there was a movie that was 200 hours long and you chose to stay for the entire duration and not walk out, then you either enjoyed the movie or you need to learn about the sunk-cost fallacy

        • muse@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          And don’t circlejerk over the dead horse that this game is unsalvageable because it had a shitty release. People forgave No Man’s Sky, but the internet won’t let this one go.

          • anonono@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            You got it completely wrong.

            Shitty games with shitty releases go into oblivion, the game is obviously good.

            I’m not criticizing the game, I’m criticizing the company and the billionaries that preside it and decided people swallow it all up if they launched a game in the state they did.

        • MiltownClowns@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          The analogy your looking for is that you get your money’s worth out of every movie you see 3 times in the theater but only pay once.

          it’s a shitty take.

          don’t pretend you didn’t screw up

      • flux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        No it’s a good game. I like it even with the qc issues because it’s ambitious. But the devs are basically admitting that they worked on it for 3 years to fullfill the original vision and it’s so much better that it’s worth starting over.

    • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      PC launch play was mostly fine. Only Console launch, mostly caused by massive delusion about min. spec.s, was f’d up completely. The PC issues were also the easiest to fix and even when they could fix the Console issues, they had to convince the Console store’s Owners that the relaunch wouldn’t be a shit show. But then I play on PC and so expect similar to last time, once I buy it after it launches.

    • Chev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      You make it sound like they are forcing you to do so. You have the freedom of choice.

      • flux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Of course. I’m happy they are allowing you to continue. I’ll keep going as I like the game.