Cyberpunk 2077 is getting a mammoth-sized update, titled Update 2.0, tomorrow, September 21, and it promises to be a bit of a game changer. A police revamp, a progression overhaul, a new cybernetics system, vehicular combat, DLSS 3.5—it’s vast, and thankfully separate from the Phantom Liberty expansion due next week, so you’ll get all of this for free. With so many changes, the developer is naturally recommending that you experience it all on a fresh save, starting a new game rather than continuing an existing one.

It’s entirely possible to just carry on with an old save, but making a new character will ease you into all of the big changes, most notably the skill system, which might be a bit jarring if you have to rebuild an existing character. “Due to the number of changes, starting fresh will enhance your overall gameplay experience,” reads the tweet from CD Projekt Red.

Hey, chooms! While you’ll be able to continue the game with your current character on an existing save, we recommend starting a new game after @CyberpunkGame
Update 2.0. Due to the number of changes, starting fresh will enhance your overall gameplay experience!

  • flux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Hey gonks! Remember that game we released and was dirty as hell but you all gave up the eddies because we told you it was preem. We finally have the game we should have released just 3 years later. Go ahead and flatline your 200hr characters and reboot.”

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      If you got 200hours out of release then clear you got your moneys worth out of the game and enjoyed it, promises not kept or not.

      Personally the game could’ve been better but I certainly enjoyed the one 120ish hour playthrough I did and had no major issues other than some texture bugs or weird physics, I had a capable PC though not a last gen console trying to play at being modern.

      • anonono@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        31
        ·
        2 years ago

        by that definition you get your money’s worth of every movie you watch in the theater, the longer the better.

        it’s a shitty take.

        don’t pretend they didn’t screw up.

        • Primarily0617@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          2 years ago

          if there was a movie that was 200 hours long and you chose to stay for the entire duration and not walk out, then you either enjoyed the movie or you need to learn about the sunk-cost fallacy

        • muse@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          And don’t circlejerk over the dead horse that this game is unsalvageable because it had a shitty release. People forgave No Man’s Sky, but the internet won’t let this one go.

          • anonono@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            You got it completely wrong.

            Shitty games with shitty releases go into oblivion, the game is obviously good.

            I’m not criticizing the game, I’m criticizing the company and the billionaries that preside it and decided people swallow it all up if they launched a game in the state they did.

        • MiltownClowns@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          The analogy your looking for is that you get your money’s worth out of every movie you see 3 times in the theater but only pay once.

          it’s a shitty take.

          don’t pretend you didn’t screw up

    • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      PC launch play was mostly fine. Only Console launch, mostly caused by massive delusion about min. spec.s, was f’d up completely. The PC issues were also the easiest to fix and even when they could fix the Console issues, they had to convince the Console store’s Owners that the relaunch wouldn’t be a shit show. But then I play on PC and so expect similar to last time, once I buy it after it launches.

      • flux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        No it’s a good game. I like it even with the qc issues because it’s ambitious. But the devs are basically admitting that they worked on it for 3 years to fullfill the original vision and it’s so much better that it’s worth starting over.

    • Chev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      You make it sound like they are forcing you to do so. You have the freedom of choice.

      • flux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Of course. I’m happy they are allowing you to continue. I’ll keep going as I like the game.

  • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    As they’ve rearranged and completely changed lots of the controls and menus, I’ll need to start a new campaign just to learn to play it.

        • Retreaux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Seriously the assumption of free time that corpos have for their consumer base is WILD, but it just feeds into the ‘must have 100% market share’ mentality that drives the culture as we lose every shred of our living moments on anything but living

  • XbSuper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Cool, maybe I’ll actually pick this up next time it’s on sale (and includes the dlc).

  • flux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m actually a fan of the game because I can see the vision they had. I think people are more harsh because they see how great it, “could have been”. But to this day so many weird bugs, qc issues that are not even graphics related. Basic qc like overlapping dialogue, mission problems, things disappearing, etc. I’m rooting for the team to keep up improvements. But for them to tell me I’d have a better time starting over is a little annoying. If this is so much better what was I playing before ? Sure, more money, feedback and most of all time is going to make a better game.But they know there are things they could have done better if they are suggesting starting over.

    • GunValkyrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      They are suggesting you start over so you can enjoy the rebalance of the game with the updates. They aren’t saying you have to, just that you’ll get the most out of it if you do.

  • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m really excited to play with all these changes. I have just shy of 200 hours for 2 playthroughs, and virtually every change they’ve made here seems like it’ll improve things a lot.

  • spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m so excited to play this on PS5. Survived a 50 hours playthrough on PS4, liked the story enough but almost purely ground my way through due to shitty performance. This time I wanna just enjoy it as it was meant to be played :)

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      played the OG version on release. there is a “point of no return” message for the end of the game. If you complete game or save after that point and reopen that save you’re locked into that ending based on what you did prior to crossing the point of no return.

      so the playable sections all come before this — so if you missed something after completing you can reload your “Meet [Person] At Embers Bar” save (the point of no return) — go do it with your endgame character and then optionally revisit the final section if you like.

      from what I gather on loading up an old save after this patch you’ll have to re spec your character and may have missed minor things, but can start all the new content from your …Embers save.

      From a new player perspective you can choose to do the DLC or the vanilla game at any order or at any point- gated by your character level and progression, similar to how Fallout DLC works.

  • Chev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    In best case, I will play the game after the first patch after 2.0 + PL. Good that I’m still in my first playthrough in Baldurs Gate 3. So if the patch comes around the weekend of the 6th of October, I should be fine.