The summer is over, schools are back, and the data is in: ChatGPT is mainly a tool for cheating on homework.::ChatGPT traffic dropped when summer began and schools closed. Now students are back, and they’re using the AI tool again more.

    • foo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      My senior secondary board believes that students. should spend 6 hours a week per subject on top of the hours they are physicians in class. It is insane

  • VictorPrincipum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    “You can use AI such as ChatGPT or Copilot on your senior projects, just make sure the code works, you understand it enough to document it, and your sponsor is ok with external code use” - paraphrased from my Software Engineering department head about our senior capstone projects.

    “I have the kids ask ChatGPT for an essay and then have the (8th grade) kids treat it like a rough draft so they have practice editing it” - my English teacher Father

    The best way to handle it is to embrace and use it to augment your skills, much like calculators in math classes.

    • grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 years ago

      Both of these methods require the student to understand the work. My old man brain insists they should have to code assembly from scratch and walk through snow storms to a library for their essay research, but in reality this is likely how this technology will be used. It’s a practical approach. The 8th grade version should probably include fact checking.

    • Solumbran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      A calculator calculates. An AI bullshits.

      The only thing ChatGPT can actually do might be marketing speeches, since they are nonsensical to start with and made by things pretending to be humans.

      • foo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s arguable that most of what we generate is mostly vague partially inaccurate bullshit.

        • Solumbran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Unless you are a rock, your brain processes information to extract meaning from it. AIs don’t.

  • BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Clearly an article written to fit a headline rather than the other way around. They talk about use in education settings as a sign that the use cases are limited, despite accounting for only a 12% increase.

    In other news, pencil use is up 100% in the last month, signaling that pencils have limited use cases and are only good for cheating on homework.

    • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Bro the capability of a pencil is a far better medium to expresses concepts. One could argue that a pencils ability to express shades of grey exceeds the capability of the pen. In some ways the pen has an effect of finality.

  • specterspectre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Handwritten assignments are going to make a comeback. It’s hard to cheat through an essay you have to write on the spot.

    • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah I mean just make homework worthless and the cams everything.

      Pretty simple. College professors have been doing this forever

  • Water1053@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    At work when I write certain emails or code snippets I’ll paste them into ChatGPT and ask it to make the email sound “more professional” or “optimize this code.” ChatGPT also talks to me like SHODAN from System Shock 😆

    • BlueBockser@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I hope you know what you’re doing. That’s a good way to share company secrets with outsiders, also it’s uncertain whether you’re even legally allowed to use the resulting code.

      • Water1053@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I appreciate your concern, but no worries. The company code is structured text as I program B&R PLCs and ChatGPT is pretty useless (so far) for that kind of code. The python code I paste in is more for personal hobbies.

        • 🐍🩶🐢@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          In a similar industry. Friend used it to write Wireshark dissectors for their interface between the PLC and software system. I haven’t used ChatGTP yet, but for certain boiler plate tasks it might be useful. I used to dump tag lists and generate ladder logic with some regex and python to fix the rung numbering within Notepad++. Dumb stuff nobody wants to do by hand.

    • Melco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Except that the code it gives you back doesn’t work. It looks nice but horribly broken, sometimes it isn’t even the same language.

      • aleq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Prompt better. I use it extensively and the code I get is usually a good start. But it can’t do anything.

  • ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Egh Moody adults are ignorant to how it works, how to prompt well, and are scared of using it at work.

    Kids are going to gobble that shit up. It’s being used for cheating until the kids get into the workforce.

    • Solumbran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      If anything, people who like chatGPT are the ones ignorant of how it works (spoiler: it doesn’t).

      And kids with their understanding of technology being limited to youtube and tiktok have no clue about what an AI is. They see it, like most people, as a magic black box that is incredibly smart. Apart from being a black box, none of that is true.

    • naught@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Yeah, shitty article. AI is the same as calculators. So what! Kids don’t have to waste mental cycles with your tedious and borderline sadistic amounts of homework. Go fly a kite.

      edit: clarification

  • pec@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    So the homework is encouraging kids to explore a real life tool and the teacher can look at the result and corrects any issue with the result thus guiding the students towards a appropriate usage.

    It’s a good thing.

      • pec@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Would you rather have them only use it outside of school work where no one will point out that it can be wrong? Teachers could also ask questions on the studied subject in class to teach student that by copy pasting the output they are not learning much.

        ChatGPT exist, kid will use it. Should adults guide them?

      • foo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        At the end of the day generative AI not only exists but is likely right at the start of a logistics curve. In ten years time this tech is going to be pervasive

  • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I feel this is a political issue on the understanding of ai. It is a powerful tool and all powerful tools garner a certain amount of fear. Ultimately the protests against ai will fail and if history has taught us anything that protesting efficiency will be futile.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m not sure whether or not to call my daughter lucky that she couldn’t get away with this on her school-issued Chromebook, but it’s probably for the best.