• paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      You mean front ends to YouTube infrastructure? Or stuff like Loops? One of those two are cool, the other is unsustainable if it were to get popular. Well, maybe both? I guess it depends on how the FOSS infrastructure works about.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    What was the advantage again, except for seeing a few less ads if you are to stupid to install an adblocker?

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      YouTube music is pretty good. And a good deal of you already pay for another service like Spotify that you can drop

      • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Ehhhhhhhh, like most Google services and products, it’s okay if you’re the narrow focus user group that its designed around.

        I, for one, don’t want my YouTube likes and playlists all the same list as my music likes and playlists.

        Google Play music felt cheaper, but was better almost all around. And Spotify, if you ignore them promoting ice and platforming and paying people like joe rogan and none of their musical artists and a bunch of other borderline evil things, actually had the best design and service… I say had, because most of the service they really offer is the algorithm and databases, which a few years ago got really really shitty for some reason. Spotify has always flirted with having and not having incredible algorithms for suggesting music… for whatever reason, 2016 was peak, and it’s had some pretty radical falls since then, to now, where it’s the most intelligence-insultingly bad algo I’ve ever seen, besides YouTube proper.

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    My proposal: cancel YouTube premium, donate $1 to Smart Tube developer, donate $1 to Firefox. ublock origin doesn’t accept donations as far as I know.

  • ropatrick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Libretube, smarttube and the like. You realise the amount of bloated shit there is on YT when you use one of those. They are like a front end on the infra I suppose. Not familiar with Loops, must go digging!

  • zikzak025@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    I used to pay less than the single plan for a family plan, split between 5 people. Back when ad-free YouTube was an afterthought and my primary reason for using it was Google Play Music’s unlimited music storage and streaming.

    The amount they just increased the cost of YouTube is about how much I’d be willing to pay total for no ads. Until then, they’re competing against zero ads (but no casting) for free.

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    YouTube is the new cable, and it will take monumental effort to dethrone it. Hosting video at this scale is expensive. And people loathe having to go to multiple places to get video. Users, including people on Lemmy, want all of their video entertainment on one platform. They hate multiple subscriptions. They hate having their games in multiple storefronts.

    There are user behaviors that enable these bad things to happen. And people need to start ranting about these factors and educating people about how multiple platforms are good, actually. Multiple options for account servers are good, actually. Multiple video hosts are good, actually. Paying creators for content is good.

    The solution is not to hack YouTube and put a different front end on their infrastructure.