0110010001100010@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoPeople who work from home all the time ‘cut emissions by 54%’ against those in officewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up1894arrow-down111cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1883arrow-down1external-linkPeople who work from home all the time ‘cut emissions by 54%’ against those in officewww.theguardian.com0110010001100010@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square71fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-square_number8_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up45·2 years agoWFH allowance should be mandated – anyone that wants it for a job where it’s possible must be allowed it. it’s such a dramatic quality of life difference.
minus-squareelectrogamerman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·2 years agofor literally no cost too. What exactly are companies losing with WFH? Literaly nothing.
minus-squareMuffi@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down1·2 years agoControl. And that is a scary thing to lose if you’re a bad manager.
WFH allowance should be mandated – anyone that wants it for a job where it’s possible must be allowed it. it’s such a dramatic quality of life difference.
for literally no cost too. What exactly are companies losing with WFH? Literaly nothing.
Control. And that is a scary thing to lose if you’re a bad manager.
Then hire better managers