US authorities ask locals for help in finding missing F-35 jet — Authorities say they are searching for the $80m jet around two lakes in the state of South Carolina::Authorities say they are searching for the $80m jet around two lakes in the state of South Carolina.

  • galil3o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 years ago

    Better question is why, at $80m per plane, they cant find a way to track these assets even when they crash

    • extant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 years ago

      Because they spent $80 million dollars to make it untraceable so it wouldn’t get shot down.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      If your plane crashes over unfriendly territory, you don’t want to make it easier for them to get their hands on it.

      • Puzzle_Sluts_4Ever@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Exactly

        If you have a beacon? Even an insanely directional connection to a GPS satelite is still going to bounce off clouds and the like.

        And a beacon that triggers the moment it crashes? The expected crash location is not The Hardy Boyz Compound. It is Iraq or Russia or China. Every minute we can buy to “dispose of” any of the juicy bits matters.

    • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Better question is why is 1/3rd of my paycheck being stolen every week so we can build, and lose, fleets of $80 million planes

  • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    Kind of crazy as someone who’s been around the block to see F-35 referred to as a “$80M aircraft”.

    Economies of scale DID actually kick in this time, unlike (gestures to every other stealth aircraft).

    • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Frankly, it helps that this one is being exported to pretty much the whole of NATO (and then some). Enough countries outside the USA are funneling money in that the R&D actually is worth it this time.

  • theragu40@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    What is this, a Zelda side quest? Lol. I’d love to help you find the princess but I’m just so broken up over this missing F-35. If you can help me find it, I think I’ll be able to remember where I saw her last. There might also be 20 rupees in it for ya. Thanks!

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’d imagine they would have RTK with a CGA response on something worth $80M. I put that in a drone for $250. But idk if it would be able to respond underwater. You’d think they’d have a track up until it went under.

        • Dashi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m not an engineer, or have any real qualifications on the subject. But I’m guessing you would want to cut all transmissions you can from a stealth jet.

        • maniacal_gaff@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          RTK requires a separate receiver which is located nearby and has a comms link (unlikely for a fast moving attack aircraft) and only reduces the accuracy from meters to cm. Not sure there’s much need there.