• Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Idk, I’m willing to give the guy the benefit of the doubt because, despite the bullshit with Microsoft, he did some great charity work and raised his children well, which hints at some decency if it wasn’t his wife pushing him into it. There’s also reason to believe that some people will be named who were not guilty, but that’s only while nothing comes of the files or anything of the sort, because otherwise he squashes like a bug.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      His charities are a tax evasion tool that happen to be helpful at some level.

      And if he was half as honest, he wouldn’t have waited for the proof to be out there before admitting what he did.

      What I suspect now is there might be more, but it hasn’t been released, so he won’t mentioned it.

      And about his decency: he abused Microsoft leading position to enact all kinds of dirty and shady tricks. MS lost quite some lawsuits because of that, but he knew very well whatever downfall would happen way too late to fix things.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That’s not how taxes and charity works.

        If you spend $100 minutes on charity and “write it off”, that saves you $30 on taxes. You’re still down $70.

        (You only can claim itemized deductions if you have more than, roughly $12k of them, 24k if you’re married.)