Apple users bash new iPhone 15: ‘Innovation died with Steve Jobs’::Smart phone fans are griping about Apple’s new devices since the arguably anti-climactic announcement of the forthcoming iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus on Tuesday.

    • waitmarks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It’s an insult to call this an article, is regurgitating some shit some dudes on twitter said.

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Eh. I mean, are there any great innovations left when it comes to smartphones? They kinda all just look and do the same nowadays.

    They sure made USB3 look like a breakthrough innovation, though…

    • Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Functioning AI voice assist, foldable, better peripherals, better input systems, better data transfer between systems, more durable, better battery life, repairable, more sustainable, better UI, decentralised communication options, meshnet options, etc.

      There’s plenty to do about smartphones that needs innovating…

      • qooqie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        They are always making Siri better (check out the news for it), I super do not want a foldable phone, the Apple peripherals are quite good, the data transfer between Apple systems is one of the main appeals of Apple, never broke an Apple product unless I chuck it at a wall, battery life is quite good I have a 4 year old phone that still has 24 hour battery life, Apple is committed to making not just their products but the entire company carbon neutral by 2030, Apple UI is also one of the main appeals since it’s so nice.

        • EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Apple is committed to making not just their products but the entire company carbon neutral by 2030

          Literally every major company on the planet is, doesn’t mean they actually are working towards it.

            • EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Wow I’m sure the website from apple full of promises is a good indicator of how good they’re actually doing for the environment. I’m sure they’re also planning to stop their model based on mass producing new hardly-repairable phones every year and pushing consumers to buy them rather than keeping their functioning ones, sometimes by cutting support and bricking their old phones.

      • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Apple is always doing all of that other than the fokdable, which has been turned for a long time.

        AirDrop and AirPlay are always getting better between Apple products. They literally just made the iPhone titanium for better durability. It has better battery life pretty much every year.

        This one is more repairable than ever with the easily removable glass.

        Those are all things Apple announces every year and everyone shits on them because it’s not innovative enough, like every year needs to be 2011 again when phones were making massive leaps year over year.

        Like oh, this chip is only 20% faster than the last one with only 10% better battery life. Yawn.

        • EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Last I checked they’re not very keen on repairability (Being able to remove glass and being able to fix everything are two different things) and sustaniability (and no making a phone more efficient/produce less ghg/etc does not mean caring about sustainability when your whole model is mass producing and selling new phones every year while encouraging customers to ditch their current functioning phones for the new one, sometimes by purposefully removing support for them or bricking them with updates)

          • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            iPhones are more repairable than their comparable flagships from other companies. https://www.ifixit.com/smartphone-repairability

            iFixit gave the 14 and 14 plus a 7 for repairability and a 6 for the pros, compared to a 3 for the Galaxy S22 and S22 ultra. The Pixel 6 pro only got a 5 and the base pixel 6 got a 6.

            The 15 pro introduced more repairability with changing the back glass mechanism to be easily swappable, which was the biggest issue with earlier pro models and why they only got a 6.

            They support phones longer than anyone else, and have a massively more robust recycling program to recapture virtually everything from older models and use them in new ones.

            Also, plot twist, every company has the same model of encouraging you to buy a new one every year. That’s not specific to Apple in the least. Other companies essentially force you to upgrade sooner by dropping support entirely after a couple of versions while Apple supports for 5-7+ years.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Of course, they’re just being done on Android until Apple takes them on later and markets them as their innovations.

      Foldables are already a thing and the next iPhone will likely be their version of it.

    • SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      They sure made USB3 look like a breakthrough innovation, though…

      I’ve commented this elsewhere in this thread:

      All accessory vendors are going “woah, revolutionary! Apple is now USB-C”, but Apple itself isn’t being too pushy about it. They’re more focused on the titanium shell, better cams and action button.

      I dislike Apple, but I think it’s mostly vendors and reviewers that highlight the connector (both protocol and form), Apple isn’t doing it.

    • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      If people could easily point to what the future innovations would be, they wouldn’t be innovations.

    • los_chill@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I think innovations in phones are going to go the other direction honestly. Bringing back shit like eink displays, batteries that last days, fuck it, am/fm… New consumer tech is outpacing the users needs. I see a touch of old standards making a comeback. Hell how old is USB-C?

      • Dasnap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Fuck it, but an antenna and TV tuner on there. Give Cathode Ray Dude something to enjoy.

        • los_chill@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Neither is what Apple is doing and I guess thats my point. How much higher tech to people reasonably need or want in their pocket? Is innovation for its own sake really innovation? They are just remarketing existing tech as features without a demand.

          • El Barto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Oh, in that case I would have said something like “Companies are bringing back useful features and call it innovation.”

  • droidpenguin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ll admit the hardware on iPhones is excellent but waaayy overkill for iOS.

    Let me install my own third party apps w/o the App store (I know altstore exists, but needing to renew apps every few days is super janky). If I spend my money on a device, I should be allowed to put whatever I want on it, however I want. Let me, the consumer accept the risks of doing so.

    Let me use HDMI out over USB-C to an external monitor and have a full desktop with ability to run desktop class apps. Let me use the full potential of the chipsets to get actual work done and effectively replace a computer.

    Till then, Android it is for me because I can do both these things easily. I know my use cases are more niche, but “Pro” naming on consumer Apple products is just fluff.

    • krayj@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      Let me install my own third party apps w/o the App store (I know altstore exists, but needing to renew apps every few days is super janky). If I spend my money on a device, I should be allowed to put whatever I want on it, however I want. Let me, the consumer accept the risks of doing so.

      This is THE reason I switched from Apple to Android in 2017 and never looked back.

    • Fredol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The soc is super powerful, but iOS won’t even let you multitask anything. Can’t even download stuff in the background, or do anything in the background. You start a file upload? Too bad, app was killed as soon as you left it. While on android I can use ffmpeg for an hour in the background and it’s still running because I authorized it to run as long as it needs to run.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Unless forced this will never happen on Apple devices. The reason has nothing to do what they claim, about protecting users and people not knowing better. It has everything to do with locking people in their ecosystem. If uncurrated store appears it might bring with it applications that help people migrate out of the Apple ecosystem or provide compatibility with “undesired” devices. Better compatibility with Android watches means lower chances of people buying Apple Watch, etc.

  • DarkWasp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t know what people are expecting anymore, phones are a mature market. Short of something like foldables (which don’t seem to be catching on) they’re going to be iterative updates. Look at TVs and computers. Years of big advancements and then they’re iterative.

    Also the NY Post is an absolutely terrible publication to link to.

    • Meganium97@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I mean I’d agree but apple consistently jacks up the prices with every “new” release. I’m going to assume that the 15 is literally just the 14 with usb c.

  • BURN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    At this point I’m trying to figure out what people want from yearly releases. iPhones are pretty much already packed with every feature imaginable. There’s not much more to add without completely transforming the device into something it isn’t.

    • Genericusername@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      I really liked the times when features were added and not killed off.

      10 years ago you could purchase a flagship phone with IR blaster for controlling whatever you couldn’t find a remote for, or trolling people in public spaces by turning off their TVs. Cloud storage wasn’t as popular, but if your phone died, the images were safe on the micrSD card. Bluetooth headsets were a thing, but you could always just use a cheap pair of headphones to stick in the headphone jack. People who desired it could install a custom ROM with all kinds of optimizations and less bloat. It used to be a lot more popular back then. Other than cameras, battery life, and reversible and more robust USB-C connectors, there isn’t much innovation. I used to feel like I owned my device much more back then. Now I only use the stock ROM, can either use wireless headphones or ones that use the charging port. I can’t insert a microSD, or test new features for Android ported from other devices by someone on XDA Developers. I’m not using the phone the way I want, but the way the companies who made it decided on.

    • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      I want the iPhone mini back, that’s really it. Everything else is pretty minor at this point.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It has nothing to do with features and performance, most people don’t use those anyway. You really don’t need 8-core CPU on your phone but it’s 2 more than 6 and me having 8 and you having 6 has everything to do with that. People love status symbols and pointing them out to others, as if that makes them better by comparison or something.

      No matter what others say, you really don’t feel limitations of your device. Sure screen might feel a bit faster, animations might feel more fluid. None of those a crucial to device operation and use and certainly not worth paying premium price for newest iteration that has all those marginally improved. It’s just consumerism at work.

      Case in point, pretty much every MacBook Pro has a TPM chip on it (trusted platform module). Guess how many people used it or has it configured to supply entropy to their systems to increase security. ThinkPads also have those, but most other laptops don’t. Even most developers don’t know what those are. They are great addition and extra feature for business users… but for the most part it’s just another thing on the spec sheet that people pay for but never use.

      As for the every imaginable feature… it seems they are being removed rather than added. I found 3.5mm jack useful. I wish we still had qwerty keyboards on our big screen devices as most used feature of phones these days is typing. I wish we had expansion slots and memory cards. I wish we had replaceable batteries so you don’t have to depend on finding an outlet on long trips. I wish we had sapphire screens so you don’t have to worry about scratching your screen. I wish we had smaller devices because some people just need a phone and not a tablet or they have smaller hands. But naaah… removing those is considered brave.

    • Meruem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Lol wot? “Every feature imaginable” 🤣🤣🤣 did I read this right?!

      • III@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        They just haven’t yet “imagined” the many new features we have received in the last few years from non-Apple phones. Don’t worry, once Apple “imagines” it, they will acknowledge the only logical truth they could conceive. That Steve Jobs’ consciousness uploaded to an iMac has graced them with innovation once again.

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    So stop buying them!

    1/2 the people complaining about the lack of innovation will turn around and order a new iPhone within the next 12 months or so. Apple doesn’t know or care about your snarky comments about them, but they sure as hell know you just gave them many hundreds of dollars for a new phone.

  • Xero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    You don’t buy Apple products for the technology or innovations anymore, now you buy Apple products for the bragging rights of being able to pay premium prices for things everyone else has been using for a decade that have a lot more features for a fraction of the price.

    • DarkWasp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      This is a take I would expect to see on Reddit, it’s simply not true. None of those devices run iOS either which is what a lot of people prefer. It’s okay to dislike something, you don’t need to insult the people that do.

  • Dick Justice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    iPhone users wouldn’t piss on the best part of an innovative phone if it was on fire. Who are we kidding?

  • Zealousideal_Fox900@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ngl they kinda are right. The last time I saw a feature that made me consider them was maybe like 4-6 years ago. I still bloody love Ipods tho.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    It died long before Steve Jobs did. Steve straight up fought tooth and nail to keep superior emerging technologies like OLED off new iPhone’s.

    • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Steve’s big computer innovation was fanless design. Apple had to design custom power supplies with custom voltages and custom motherboards. Then the power supplies started overheating and failing after a couple years the replacement power supply was 500 when a normal power supply was 100.

  • Skkorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Apple fans are delusional, the iPhone has always don’t tiny ass incremental changes. This is par for the course.

  • MyDogLovesMe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    I just miss all the backwards comparability Jobs used to maintain. When he was driving the bus, he may have been a complete asshole, but he made sure a 12 year old mac computer could still work with the new tech, as best as it could.

    Snow Leopard was the last, glorious OSX that was secure (enough), and very malleable.

    Now? I want to dump their whole ecosystem.

    • Ejh3k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Do it. I did and never regretted it. I don’t know anyone who has. And you aren’t locked in like you think. It’s really easy to convert everything over.

    • seeaya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t think Apple has every really had great backwards compatibility. Apple’s last PowerPC computers shipped in 2005, and in 2009 Snow Leopard released with no PowerPC support. That’s 4 years of upgrades, which is about the same as it is now for macOS.

  • ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Imagine if these stupid fucking articles came out about desktops and laptops each year. What is wrong with you people that you upvote this shit out come in here bitching about how apple NEVER innovated.