The Supreme Court is allowing California to use its new congressional map for this year’s midterm election, clearing the way for the state’s gerrymandered districts as Democrats and Republicans continue their fight for control of the U.S. House of Representatives.

The state’s voters approved the redistricting plan last year as a Democratic counterresponse to Texas’ new GOP-friendly map, which President Trump pushed for to help Republicans hold on to their narrow majority in the House.

And in an unsigned order released Wednesday, the high court’s majority denied an emergency request by the California’s Republican Party to block the redistricting plan. The state’s GOP argued that the map violated the U.S. Constitution because its creation was mainly driven by race, not partisan politics. A lower federal court rejected that claim.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Racial gerrymandering is now effectively constitutional so long as there’s a fig leaf of partisanship.

    Which is why… I’m saying… We need a constitutional amendment… to make it illegal outright to gerrymander.

    • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I don’t mean to argue that an amendment wouldn’t work, or be the correct next-step. We just don’t need to wait for one, just like we didnt need one to pass a law making an officiated gay marriage legit in every state no matter what local laws say.

      It’s like SCOTUS reform. Sure, we should pass an amendment and enshrine the reform into a hard-to-revert form, but that shouldn’t stop us from defining good behavior and kicking Scalia to the curb.