• one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Mint? Based on Ubuntu 22.04? Seems a hint dated.

    No offense, I swear. But I have a buddy who has to support Mint installs for work and it honestly sounds horrible.

    Then again, the ease of use is probably worth the time saved setting up Arch.

    Edit: It is Pop!_OS that is based on Ubuntu 22.04 not Mint. Ubuntu spinoffs spun me through a loop.

    • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      buddy who has to support Mint installs for work

      The “work” part is probably why you have such a bad view of Mint. It could be any OS, but at work there would be a horror story every day (because theres a lot of people, most cant use computers, etc).

      The ease of use and not having it break randomly is why you don’t use Arch for normal people who just need to get stuff done.

      • one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Actually I want to delete my comment… 22.04 is actually Pop!_OS not Mint. So I’m really dumb there, admittedly, Ubuntu spinoffs get me a little mixed up.

        And the work bit, in truth, I think he could fix it by using a btrfs partition, snapper, and grub-btrfs. Build the machine to automatically take snapshots so if someone breaks it, you can fix it faster.

        And yeah, ease of use is important, that was not meant as a criticism instead I pointed out a logical reason why Mint made sense.

        Long story short, comment stupid, my bad.

    • tyrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are many stops between mint and arch. I’d personally point a new user towards fedora or maybe another Debian distro

      • one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Honestly, I’m with you on that one. Debian is reliable, so it send like the safest option. Personally, I use it for my seed box, and I’ve helped others set their own up to. Fedora, on the other hand, introduces package updates a little more frequently and in the long run, I think it’s more enjoyable to work on in a desktop environment.