Happily, PlayStation 5 manages to deliver a creditable rendition of the game, but the now legendary Act Three continues to humble CPU performance - perhaps more than we anticipated going in.

  • Weslee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It’s runs on ultra on my 1060 gtx, I’m not surprised it runs well on consoles, the game is pretty nicely optimized

    • holiday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      2060 super user here. I’m assuming you haven’t made it to Act 3? The game has some performance issues there. I happily turned down the graphics to continue playing smoothly but was a tad disappointed.

      I’m on my second playthrough though and they have patched it since my first experience so hopefully the evil campaign runs (visually) smoother.

      • zanariyo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Act 3’s issues aren’t GPU bound, it’s entirely CPU bottlenecked. It’s likely someone with a slower GPU won’t see as big a drop in performance in act 3 as you, and it’s likely you don’t see any performance gain from using DLSS in act 3. My 2080 Super was sleeping through it even at 3440x1440 on ultra while my Ryzen 7 3700x was getting thrashed.

  • sp6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    More info from the article: quality mode is 1440p 30fps, and performance mode is 960p (upscaled to 1440p using FSR2) 60fps. Although late-game, specifically the big cities in act 3, can dip into mid-20fps range

  • catshit_dogfart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think this game could run on PS4 just fine. Turn off raytracing and a few other things and it would probably work.

    But then, I guess they can’t keep releasing for the old console forever.

    • sadreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If there is money in it… Why not?

      We got millions of gamers on old hardware. If they can do it, let all gamers have at it imho

      • Omega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        PS5 gamers are more likely to put down $70 for a new game than PS4 players are to put down $60 on a new game. It’s probably just not a worthwhile investment.

      • FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Consoles are expensive. Cutting off support to older equipment is rough. Keeping your entertainment “current” is a big ask for a lot of people who are already struggling. As long as people are using the old stuff, devs should do what they can inside the technical limits to extend their lifespan.