• luk___@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Any islamic subject is a very good way to drive people attention away from other subjects. Each time the government wants to avoid to talk about a given subject they found something new to make scandals. For example, they don’t have enough teachers anymore, thousands of them are needed but the most important subject that the whole country should discuss is a few hundred people wearing abayas.

  • ???@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Set against the 12 million school boys and girls who started term on Monday, the government believes the figures show that its ban has been broadly accepted.

    Lol the target was like 300 girls tp start with. What a pitiful way to call this a win.

    • Hillock@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      France banned basically all religious symbols in public schools. This includes crosses or the Jewish kippah. It’s now expanded to include the abaya dresses. Veils and headscarves were already banned.

      I think it’s stupid since the dress isn’t necessarily religious. It’s just commonly worn by Muslims. Might as well ban white buttoning down shirts at this point because that’s what some christians wear, especially to church.

      • FinnFooted@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m curious as to how they even define and abaya. Like… Other than being a loose fitting dress made of a square piece of cloth, theres not much to define it. Dresses that fit the description are also worn by “westerners.”

      • sonovebitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        the dress isn’t necessarily religious

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abaya

        essentially a robe-like dress, worn by some women in parts of the Muslim world

        It is common that the abaya is worn on special occasions, such as Mosque visits, Islamic Holiday celebrations for Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha and also during the Islamic Holy month of Ramadan

        I also wear a kippa on my head and a cross around my meck. But it’s not necessarily religious. I just like the design. /s

        France is a secular country. It’s probably hard to understand for you free people of freedomland, but ALL signs of religion are banned from public institutions.

        • cley_faye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Funny how no one cared about teachers having a cross around their neck when I was in school. I guess it wasn’t for religious reasons, right?

        • Hillock@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          So let’s ban underwear and shoes because those are also worn in the Muslim world. And anyone who is wearing a baseball cap or hat isn’t allowed to take it off because taking off a hat inside has christian influence.

          The abaya is just like a suit or a dress worn by people to church. And neither are banned in public schools. If a french girls wears an abaya few would even know it’s an abaya. And ton of western style maxi-dresses are similar in style to an abaya.

  • Kra@mtgzone.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Very good. If you want to live in a European society, finally integrate and don’t separate from it actively. We don’t need a divided society with unrest. Look at Sweden rn.

    • FinnFooted@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s a loose dress. How is a generic loose dress preventing people from integrating? My american grandma has dresses like this.

      • landlordlover@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s a loose dress. How is a generic loose dress preventing people from integrating? My american grandma has dresses like this

        I think its the headscarf thingy most people have a problem with. Nobody cares about the dress part. But you likely knew that already.

        I dont care either way about the subject at hand (Not Canadian) but it would be nice if we could leave these bad faith arguments on Reddit so nobody wastes their time arguing about nonsense if its a dress or a burka.

        • FinnFooted@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          They already banned the head scarf years ago. The abaya is just a dress. Please don’t accuse me of bad faith arguments without even googling what an abaya is.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Very good

      Before this made the news, barely anyone knew what it was. The most prominent people in favor of this could not distinguish an actual fashion dress from an abaya on a picture. Stop pretending it is to help integration; it’s just harassing a very, very small minority of people, because it’s easier than address issues.

      Consider that the kids that got trouble there were actually going to a public school, and were turned away. Please tell me how that helps them integrate.

      • Kra@mtgzone.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        We have the big winner in life here, who cannot even lead a discussion without insulting people.

        • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Your comment is literally insulting people. Not directly to them, but you’re still talking shit about people.

  • BURN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is BS

    Let people wear what they want. If they want to wear religious clothing, let them. It’s not hurting anyone. This law, while technically applying equally to all religions is very clearly targeted at a single group that has been persecuted for this before

    • RazorsLedge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      Giving religion safe spaces in society normalizes it. Normalizing religion does hurt people. It hurts the mind’s ability to think rationally, not to mention all the intolerance that seems to come from it.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        2 years ago

        I disagree. I’m an atheist, and we shouldn’t restrict anyone’s ability to practice their religion unless it actually harms others. This isn’t a safe space, it’s simply persecuting a single religion because the population dislikes Muslims.

        Religion is not an exclusively bad thing. It has done harm, but it also does have good effects.

        • Anduin1357@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Well, you are wrong that religion is a good thing when people do good in spite of religion rather than because of it. If someone’s belief system is aligned with a particular religion, they can just adopt the practices of that religion without professing faith in it.

          Whatever makes them less susceptible to manipulation from religious leaders is a win in my book.

        • RazorsLedge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Agree to disagree I guess. I think we’re better off without sky fairies, regardless of whether they’re named Zeus, Jesus, Allah, whatever. The society that I’d want to live in would discourage public practices of religion.

          Another point I should have made above. As Dawkins says, normalizing religion gives the especially nutty and violent ones room to breathe. They don’t stick out so badly when their neighbor believes and practices 90% of what they do.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            As you are a minority population member who supports democratically limiting the religious beliefs of members of the population, I have to ask if you’ve ever considered that such beliefs may backfire spectacularly against you?

            • RazorsLedge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Maybe I lack imagination. What backfire should France expect with this limitation of public practice of religion?

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m not sure where I come down on this issue, but teaching women to be ashamed of their bodies is harmful to the young women.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m really glad all the smug atheists came over from reddit too

        • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It sucks, I beleave this was the wrong move because its a government acting as a parent to school kids, trying to hevy handedly disrupt that child’s religion. Wanna get these kids “free from their opressive religion”? Talk to them as a peer. Social movements are there to do that, even ones that work mainly in the school system.

          Couldn’t they’ve picked a less extreme way of handling this situation than “we are your parents, we think you shouldnt have to dress like that so now you wont”.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      It is very efficient at having people talk about it, and temporarily forget all the places missing teachers, the sad state of a lot of school buildings, the lack of recognition (and decent salary) that’s been the norm for decades at this point, and actual issues regarding kids.

      • Globulart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Oh I see, you’re actually just a blatant racist. That explains why you expect others to give a shit about your opinions on certain jokes too I suppose.

        I’m definitely a weirdo, I’ll give you that. But you’re a genuine scumbag so I’ll take weirdo all day long :) x

        You know who are really the fucking worst? Racists.

          • Globulart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            If you wanna split hairs to justify your hateful behaviour then go for it. Thankfully most of us will see it for what it is.

              • Globulart@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Racism is not just for a person’s nationality or whatever your twisted definition is anyway, but when it comes to religion and race there is a blurring.

                Judaism is a religion too, but you think anti semitic people aren’t racist?

                Racism is attributing negative traits to people based on their perceived belonging to cultural, biological, religious, national origin, and to allow this to legitimate their subordination.

                You sub human stain you :) x