That thumbnail is A+
So is the headline. Chastity cage, exposed. 🤣
Example #4363 why making everything “smart” is a terrible fucking idea
Not inherently, they coulda followed best practices. But this is definitely a reason not to buy smart things.
Next from iot the smart lung
The researcher, who asked to remain anonymous because he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does, said he gained access to a database containing records of more than 10,000 users,
10,000 users‽
he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does
Don’t mix your pen testing with your pen testing if you know what I mean.
yup :3
Rule 34 extends to action as well as observance.
Isn’t this just facilitating their humiliation kink? I think it’s more of a service.
That would be non-consensual.
Probably in the EULA
Imagine having your smart cock cage locked out by Amazon because some rando told them you are racist lmao
This exact scenario has appeared in an entirely unsurprising number of chastity stories.
And to think I don’t even feel safe about buying something as innocent as a smart TV…
I feel like like the potential for being exposed as a chastity cage user might actually be a plus for some users
If this is the same one I remember from a couple years back, what’s not listed in this article: two different security teams warned them of the vulnerabilities multiple times, the vendor claimed to have fixed the issue when they hadn’t, the devices didn’t have any sort of physical bypass in case of malfunction, and what finally convinced the pen testers to go public was the company announcing that they planned to make a locking inflatable butt plug using the same platform.
At some point the security vulnerabilities are a feature, not a bug. Butt plug ransomware is the latest sex toy fad.
It’s a new story, and the article doesn’t reveal the company… but… we all know which one it is.
???
good, cause they where stupid enough to buy a fucking smart chastity cage
Can imagine buying this if you’re in an long distance relationship and into chastity.
The company is the bad guy here, there’s no need to victim blame just because their kink doesn’t match yours.
im not saying the company isnt to blame, all im saying is a smart chastity belt is about the same level as a a smart shoe
I don’t know, if that’s the kink, that’s the kink. It’s not harming anyone who didn’t consent to it, so why kink shame them when they’re the ones who have been wronged?
literally never said anything about their kink did i. Their kink doesnt matter, them buying a needlessly “smart” smartdevice does
But the ability to control the chastity belt over the internet is part of the kink. That was my point.
Oh, well, I apologize for accidentally making it appear that i kinkshamed them
I will however not retract calling them dumb
A lot of kink relationships are long-distance. This sort of product appeals to someone in a kinky LDR.
Having a unique use case doesn’t mean it’s still not an incredibly stupid product. Same as with smart door locks, smart safes, smart guns and smart “full self driving” cars.
Liberal men on suicide watch
