Under the order, private businesses can choose to display signage indicating that ICE cannot enter without a warrant—thereby designating “their property as part of a city-wide network of community spaces that stand together in affirming the safety, dignity, and belonging of all of our residents,” the mayor said.

Johnson touted the order for building “a broad civic shield that limits the reach of harmful enforcement practices. It strengthens neighborhood solidarity and it reaffirms Chicago’s role as a welcoming city.”

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Something that the current ICE activity brings to light is how lopsided government power has become in the US. The federal government has too much internal power and influence on US soil while state and local governments have too little.

    Unless a state/local government is actively engaging in interstate crime against the wishes of their neighboring states the federal government shouldn’t have any authority to impose federal laws/rules on those states.

    The power structure of this country was more bottom up when it came to government authority and state autonomy when we broke off from the UK, we should seriously get back to that in some respects.

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I agree with the gist of that, but being born and raised in the deep south, I believe the federal government coming in to enforce civil rights was very necessary.

      That is not what this is. This is literally the opposite, and its insane that they are seriously trying to make that comparison.

      The federal government came in to desegregate public schools. They didn’t drop from helicopters on to the roof of private domiciles and send swat teams to kick down doors to arrest anybody opposed to desegregation.

      The government is supposed to protect and defend the rights of every American, even if you disagree with them. That’s also why “DEI” exists, and I hate to break it to anyone who gets angry hearing “DEI” talk, but if you’re not named something like “Welslyian Trottersworth IV,” like it or not, you have most likely benefitted from “DEI practices,” at some point in your life.

      Edit: And for those who might be asking, well what about young Welslyian? Why is he somehow less deserving just for being born into a consequence free life full of untouchable privilege? Welslyian IV is entitled to the same rights as anyone else, but exactly who TF do you think you need protection from? Who is it that you believe made society exclusionary in the first place?

      If your ancestors were among the unfortunate souls who had to leap to their deaths from a burning building because Welslyian the first had locked the factory door to keep workers from taking unnecessary breaks on the clock; or those who went down into the coal mine one day only to be buried alive and abandoned because Welslyian the first knew he could save money by just closing off the caved in mines and starting over with new workers, maybe, just maybe, you should be asking yourself why you’re so concerned about Welslyian IV not reaping the benefits of “DEI practices?”

      Do you think Welslyians I-IV have ever given a shit about you or your well being? Or have they always just exploited you for their own personal gain? If you know the answer to that, then why do you think they need you to be so concerned on their behalf now, and why do you keep falling for it?

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        It should be noted that public schools are, well public. The feds shouldn’t have a domestic police force they can target at anything they want and customs enforcement should be severely restricted geographically.

        It blows my mind that ICE shut down its like human trafficking, crime etc divisions to go after like farmworkers and home depot parking lots. It shows that what conservatives are most afraid of is seeing brown people in public and talk of “immigration enforcement” should be nakedly seen as what it actually is.

        Politicians talking about immigration should address it as such; no “bipartisan” immigration bills. You either believe in supreme court rubber stamped racial profiling or you believe in laws. There’s no bipartisanship when both sides are talking about different things. Democrats or a new party need to come up with an actual immigration system reform wholly distinct from republican race wars.

        Imo these functions should be split back up and there need to be a constitutional amendment banning the arrest of anyone under any law by a person without either a displayed ID showing a state issued badge or a warrant.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I don’t know, states have plenty of power in many ways. CA is constantly banning things, Texas banned abortions, etc. I sure as hell wouldn’t want NC’s legislature in control of the nation.