I respect people’s right to use apple products, but please stop asserting “privacy”, big corps doesn’t give a shit.

  • enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 days ago

    First of all: writing this from my iPhone. I’ve been on various android phones, including flashed to Sailfish and alternative ROMs, and I kinda hate being on an iPhone now. But - it works.

    Look at the incentives of Google and Apple. Google sells ads. That’s it. Any operation at Google other than that is just a small side hustle. Apple sells hardware and 30% commission on apps/media. Apple’s incentives to fuck over the privacy of individuals is far smaller than Google’s incentives. That’s it.

    Let’s go through the list:

    • Android vendors (Samsung et. al): Zero incentive to not sell you out. Also, no recurring revenue throughout device lifetime (except selling your data), so zero incentives to provide more than absolutely minimal software support after sale.
    • Open Source ROMs: All the incentive, but zero funding or business model. Continually fighting against Google. Thus, not really an option for ”normal” people. I won’t hand my mother a flashed phone, and she won’t be able to flash one on her own.
    • Sailfish: Had incentives and a business model. When I used it, the developers could barely keep the web browser patched. Tell me that’s good for privacy.
    • Apple: Has incentives to patch and update older phones (recurring revenues from AppStore and iCloud), and doesn’t really sell any ads themselves.

    Apple are anti-consumer assholes with a clear objective of creating lock-in under the guise of ”privacy” and ”security”, and they really want to force people into buying more hardware. Agreed. But they are the only major phone vendor that doesn’t have incentives to actively screw you over.

    Is a flashed ROM ”better” for ”privacy”? Probably. Should you get your mother an iPhone? Yes.

    • Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      17 days ago

      Both Tim and Pinchai paid Donald Trump money to attend his inauguration and lick his ass on a daily basis. They both have one very big incentive to invade their user’s privacy: American fascism.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Someone else already said it. Old style flip phone. Can text and make calls; can’t serve ads or collect any more data than your contact list.

          • enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            Yeah, but my mom can’t do banking on a flip phone.

            This is the issue. Everything sucks. Don’t complain that people make a determination to take the least fucky normal option instead of flashing privacy ROM of the week onto an old Nokia N95. Be happy they thought about privacy it at all.

            You can’t participate in normal society without a smartphone. There are two options for normal people. Pick the least shitty one.

          • FishFace@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            Don’t be facetious. Granny has a landline for calling - this is about a phone as we mean it today; a smartphone if you insist. Or how else is granny going to operate Netflix or whatever other service is only convenient on phones where they are?

    • Max@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 days ago

      Apple: Has incentives to patch and update older phones (recurring revenues from AppStore and iCloud), and doesn’t really sell any ads themselves.

      Don’t fall for Apple PR, they sell you out like everyone else does: https://ads.apple.com/

      • enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Of course they do.

        But they have recurring revenue streams other than just ads, unlike the Android vendors. Meaning - they probably won’t fuck me over as hard as Google.

        Edit: also, note that the ads they sell via your link are on their own platform, i.e. within their own ecosystem. The revenue here is most likely peanuts compared to the AppStore commissions.

      • enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Probably excellent. Can my mother buy it over the shelf, in a store?

        If not, what’s the best alternative currently available over the shelf, in a physical brick and mortar store, for my mother?

        • fin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Mothers use iPhones anyways. For now iPhone might be okay but someday it will start to suck so hard that you can’t stand using it, just like what’s happening to Windows. That’s why we need to consider start using Linux phones so your mother can ditch iPhone for it.