• CommanderM2192@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    And there are solid counter-arguments to those. Would we have long lead times if nuclear power had been developed to the point where it was easier to build and we had more workers already trained in building them?

    The more experienced construction workers you have, the more experienced scientists and engineers making necessary components, the cheaper it gets. Look at how expensive computers used to be compared to today. If we hadn’t of had Luddites getting in the way of nuclear power for half a century then we wouldn’t have this issue.

    All the more reason to move forward with nuclear power and continue improving it before it really is too late.

    “Long lead times” is utter, fucking bullshit. I’m sick and tired of “pro-environment” useful idiots shilling against nuclear power. What’s your alternative? Renewables that can’t scale to meet demand due to the laws of physics, geography, and engineering limitations? More coal and oil plants? Huge battery farms for storing electricity from renewables; the kind of batteries that devastate the environment with mining and destroy third world communities? Fusion power plants in two centuries? Get real and stop being a moron.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      If we hadn’t of had Luddites getting in the way of nuclear power for half a century then we wouldn’t have this issue.

      I think this insults Luddites. Luddites are not stupid to get in a way of nuclear power.