“In offering further thoughts on the recent ’emergency stop’ placed on her overall DC career, Red Hood Vol. 2 writer Gretchen Felker-Martin has criticized how the publisher was exceptionally fast to not just cancel, but fully recall the only published issue of her Red Hood Vol. 2, but did not offer a similar response to a number of other ‘uncouth’ creators.”
That’s a good point, it is some fucked up priorities for a publisher to not support free speech but to support rape. Gaiman is a vile and disgusting rapist who brutalized at least one vulnerable teenager and multiple adult women. If you would rather associate with someone like that and help make them richer there’s something fucked up with morals.
I suppose however that Gaiman probably had more earning potential? He has some notable works, but I do agree the publisher should have taken the high road.
I don’t think earning potential provides sufficient justification for associating with someone who rapes people. Their priorities are all fucked up.
Yes but you are a normal decent person, not a money obsessed sociopath like the upper management of a multi billion corporation
Not a justification but an explanation.
For a corporation? Of course it does.
Freedom of speech isnt freedom of consequence
We have the freedom of speech to say the consequences are stupid and unreasonable.
True and even one to support her work. Sweet liberty
I mean… they did take her work off the shelves. They did just make it harder to support her work.
30 sec of google search https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250794666/cuckoo/
Different publisher from the one being criticized? Is this irrelevant or am I missing something?
The point is to support the author or the publisher ?