• poopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Android would be unprofitable and unsustainable in isolation. So that would leave each OEM to build their own thing, but to make a long story short, everybody would just get an iPhone. So then I wonder, if making such a ruling would create the void for a monopoly, what’s the sense?

      • poopkins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        What do you mean by “get”? Who will be funding the creation of all these OSes? The phone margins are already razor thin.

          • poopkins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Android is already largely open source. Yet it takes a massive investment from Google to continue developing it and curate the app store with it.

            I’m genuinely struggling to envision how we move from the current situation to a somehow better but more fragmented ecosystem that doesn’t negatively affect consumer experiences. Whichever way I’ve approached it, it plays in the favor of one company in particular who already has a leading market share in the US, and I truly don’t see how that would be better.

            • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Sadly the failure is a governmental one. Not on any of us.

              We have monopoly laws. Mechanisms to break them up. But they generally aren’t enforced. It happens occasionally but almost never on the size of company that it was made to be used on.