That is an excellent read, not just for how to spot AI but to also many examples of non-neutral wording.
It is honestly pretty entertaining how many of the common signs of AI output do not fit the Wikipedia style requirements, and how many of them remind me of high school essays.
Something that popped up when I was looking up information for Eyes of Wakanda:
Which seems copy pasted from another AI generated site:
https://blavity.com/entertainment/eyes-of-wakanda-ending-explained
FWIW - NONE of this is true. Okoye does not appear in any of the four episodes, voiced by Danai Gurira or anyone else. Given the times the episodes are set in, 1260 BC, 1200 BC, 1400 AD and 1896 AD, that would have been impossible.
Episode 4 does have a future Black Panther, but she’s from 500 years in the future (1896 + 500 = 2396?) and voiced by Anika Noni Rose.
Really helpful page thank you for sharing.
I’d gotten really good at discerning a chatGPT bot from a human account just from years of catching bots on Reddit.
There’s a lot of red flags and tells that would be very hard to completely eradicate. There will always be an uncanny valley.
There really are 2 kinds of AI content, one-shot AI slop, and something that someone has gone back-and-forth on a few times to edit and suggest changes. The later would be very hard to tell from human generated text.
It terrfies me as someone who just got back into writing that my work might ever be accused of being AI-generated. I use Word (because I paid for it dammit) and it keeps trying to force Copilot on me. I’m hoping it doesn’t screw up my file somehow
A lot of that is “stuff humans added to essays in school in the last 30 years to fill space and sound impartial”
