• FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    10 months ago

    That website is propaganda group that both fuels and funds far-right movements. They are not journalists, but an influencing machine. The better subs have banned their links.

    If you want to read about our asshat politician and this story in particular, it’s covered here: https://irishcycle.com/2025/07/05/td-asks-about-making-high-vis-compulsory-for-all-pedestrians-cyclists-and-users-of-school-transport/

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Well if we’re going to unnecessarily inconvenience a group of people, I think a national 5mph limit would have a better effect

    • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Very common in Ireland. The main contribution of the RSA (Road Safety Authority) over the past few years seems to be handing out high-vis elements to pedestrians and cyclists. The media is antropomorphising cars instead of blaming drivers, to the extent that statistics on the causes of crashes aren’t being collected.

      • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean, making sure drivers can see you seems like a very sensible thing to do. I’ve come across pedestrians on unlit roads, and any sort of high visibility clothing or a light makes them visible from multiple times the distance.

        There’s a reason cyclists are required to have lights outside of daylight hours where I live.

        • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m currently vacationing in a country where pedestrians are required to wear reflexive elements when it’s dark, and I really like that. However, putying all onus on pedestrians while not even analyzing the causes of crashes (including hit pedestrians and cyclists), which would lead to improved road infrastructure, signage and enforcement, will lead to more deaths. As long as you’re allowed to drive 80 km/h on a winding road where two cars can’t even pass each other, no amount of lights or reflective vests will save the pedestrians.

  • Babalugats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    To be fair, here’s only saying that because the tin Man and the lion don’t have the heart or the courage to tell him he’s missing something.

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    All cars should be preceded at a distance of no less than three and no more than six metres by a walking man waving a red flag.