Somewhere in a government building in the UK: We did it, Patrick…

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 days ago

    If they did this here, I’d just stop using bluesky. I’m 41. But I have no interest in verifying ages online. We’ve all seen how poorly companies handle intetnal security.

    Just yesterday McDonalds had their entire database of applications compromised because someone tried the password 123456.

    Bluesky would be dropped instantly.

    • catty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 days ago

      This isn’t about age verification. It’s about getting your ID and tying your (probably illegal but yet to be proven) online activity to it. Much like the firewall of China.

      All wrapped up nicely in the disguise of “age verification”

  • SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Good for them. Too many goddamn kids on the internet with dumbass ideas and shitty grammar and yolos and skibidy rizz, why back in my day we have to go uphill both ways to the internet cafe before we could argue with a strawman online

  • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    Pretty concerning that a “western democracy” is doing this, because it gives cover for the next one and the next one.

    It’s easy to say “oh I’ll just stop using such and such a service” but what happens when there are no more legal services to switch to?

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The UK has been in lock step with the US in terms of moronic voters and stupid leaders.

      The UK is in Europe, but it’s closer to the morons in Texas than Switzerland.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Thanks for the information.

      I found this specific clause very … porous.

      Clarification — commercial purpose 6 For greater certainty, for the purpose of section 5, an organization that incidentally and not deliberately provides a service that is used to search for, transmit, download, store or access content on the Internet that is alleged to constitute pornographic material does not make available pornographic material on the Internet for commercial purposes.

      So… I guess Bing will once again be my goto incidental indeliberate porn search engine. And reddit. And Lemmy.

      https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/45-1/bill/S-209/first-reading

      Surprisingly, a conservative senator had a fairly well reasoned, and cautious, (although still supportive), response speech.

      https://sencanada.ca/en/content/sen/chamber/451/debates/008db_2025-06-10-e#66

      It still has a long way to goto get through senate committee and house readings and committees and all that. Still, might be a good time to scrape all the porn.

      • Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Look at Bill S-210 from the last Parliament, it made it to 2nd reading in the House. There is cause for concern.

        I appreciate your dive into the topic though. Michael Geist has more info on his website.

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Where’s that federation?

    And how would this fit in? Are they just going to build a bunch of excuses into the platform, and then claim it’s now impossible?

    • General_Effort@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is mandated by UK law. If you created a node so that UK users can bypass this, you would be doing something illegal. You’d probably get defederated.

  • ksigley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    I haven’t even verified my email with Blue. This would be more than a deal breaker.