Electing judges doesn’t really make sense to me. Are people supposed to dig up every court case they’ve ruled on? (Or for prospective new judges, every case they’ve represented in as a lawyer?)

(I’m in USA Btw; Does any other country even “elect” judges? Such a weird thing IMO.)

  • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    SCOTUS being appointed isn’t exactly the issue. It’s the fact that only the senate can give input, and since the senate favors the right wing, its composition is biased. House has no say in this, and that’s not very balanced.

    Also 9 judges is too few, easily flipped in 1 administration we saw in 2017-2021.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Technically, you can give your senator some input and tell them how to vote. They can also call in witnesses and get commentary.

      The point about scotus being appointed is that it’s still a political process, they’re still doing politics.