• carrylex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Compared to the Fairphone 5 it has some improvements but also a few downsides:

    Pro:

    • It’s a bit smaller (~4mm) and lighter (~20g)
    • Slightly better camera (future tests will tell how much better)
    • 120 Hz display
    • More RAM and storage (although I feel that the previous 6GB/128GB option was also sufficient for most users)
    • WiFi 6E Tri-Band (however you will likely never need this speed)
    • Bluetooth 5.4
    • Slightly larger battery

    Con:

    • Backpanel now requires a screwdriver
    • Display has less resolution/PPI
    • Performance of processor will likely be nearly identical to predecessor (however it’s more efficient and modern)
    • Downgrade to USB 2
    • 600€

    My conclusion: Overall the improvements are ok, however just releasing the Fairphone 5 with a newer SoC might have been the better/more cost effective choice. Sacrificing display resolution for 120 Hz feels also quite wrong. 600€ is very pricy for a phone like this. Cutting some premium features away like the 120 Hz display or a bit of RAM and storage (that you can extend anyway with an SD card) might have saved enough to get the launch price down to somewhere near 500€ which would make it accessible for a wider audience.

    • carrylex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I also found out a few other things that have changed:

      • They now use Torx T5 screws
      • The backcover and battery are now fixed with these screws
      • The battery uses a dedicated connector
      • Parts of the backcover now require a pick
      • SIM/SD now sit at the bottom in a dedicated slot and don’t require the removal of the backcover.
      • The volume buttons got replaced by the “moments” button and are now on the left

      IMHO this is kind of a downgrade in repairability as you now need custom tools (not everyone has a T5 screwdriver at home). Moving the volume buttons to the other side is also kind of weird and unexpected as most (non Apple) phones have them on the right…

    • Redex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Regarding resolution, I’ve been using my S21 Ultra at FHD quality (2400x1080) since I got it and it has a significantly large screen. I don’t see a point in higher resolutions but I definitely appreciate higher refresh rates. Makes it feel smoother and more responsive.