• fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 years ago

    At the very least they should have all long-since been converted to diesel instead of bunker fuel, which emits more carbon and a shit ton of sulfur, one of the worst greenhouse gasses. But these people give less than a fuck. Countries need to be willing to stop trade with vessels like this before even the simplest technical solutions will be adopted.

    • Jajcus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Sulfur polution actually has cooling effect, so it is kind of opposite of greenhouse gases. It sucks in different ways, though.

      • Addv4@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        If in the upper atmosphere yes, but I doubt any of the sulfer from these gets anywhere near that height, and actually just falls back down to pollute down here.

        • cyd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          No, the link seems to be real. Very recent studies based on satellite data have detected a reduction in cloud reflectivity caused by the reduction in sulfur emissions. This will accelerate global warming; by exactly how much is currently not known.