A number of party leaders are frustrated that Hogg, who has a leadership position in the party, is pushing primaries against some incumbents in deep-blue seats.
  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    321·
    14 days ago

    Goddam that guy is a natural force.

    I remember telling my wife after the Parkland high school shooting, that he might actually be able to hurt NRA, and that I hoped he’d go into politics after his education.
    He is insanely sharp, and back then he had zero tolerance for bullshit, and he was incredible at calling it out.

    I wish him all the luck. In these dire times, he is among the ones that could finally turn things around for the better in USA.
    Any Democrat living in the past, should take notice.

  • dhork@lemmy.worldEnglish
    221·
    14 days ago

    If these incumbents were actually effective, they should be able to win a primary challenge. It might even make them better, because they would have to explain their positions directly, and that can help them in the general election. Why are they afraid of it?

    This guy is gonna fund a bunch of challenges and some of them will lose. I have every confidence that he will back whoever wins the primary, even if his candidate loses. So the party ends up better in the end – as long as these new candidates are more likely to win the General Election.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      8·
      14 days ago

      Any seat that doesn’t have a primary challenger is a mistake. Incumbent should have to justify their continuing role to their own party, not just an opposing party, just like a new comer has to justify why they would be better. Maybe stability is better, maybe the incumbent is doing a great job and should continue to do so, maybe new blood with perspectives are needed, maybe more drive and passion is a priority. You know who should get to decide those things? The party voters, not the establishment.