The Michigan Court of Appeals, in an 18-page opinion, declined to interfere with a 1931 law that carries a five-year prison term for simply having brass knuckles, also known as metallic knuckles.

A “ban on the possession of metallic knuckles falls within the historical tradition of prohibiting the concealed carry of metallic knuckles as a dangerous and unusual weapon,” Judge Christopher Murray wrote in a 3-0 opinion Tuesday.

Brass knuckles are usually a single set of rings that fits on someone’s hand. A punch can inflict serious injuries.

  • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    154
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    America is weird af. Ban brass knuckles but allow semi-automatic weapons that kill thousands every year.

    Weird. As. Fuck.

    • Yokozuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yep, they sell them as belt buckles. I got one at a gun show because it was cheap, figured why not. I eventually looked up the legality and I would be better off legally if I carried a pistol. Actually crazy lol.

    • danhab99@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Afaik it’s because there’s absolutely no other applications for brass knuckles to work. You can only assault people with brass knuckles.

      Fire-arms can be used for “defence” and “hunting”.

      Edit: inb4 I don’t agree with laws around brass knuckles, or most laws about most weapons.

    • WhyFlip@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      North America? South America? Michigan is only a state in part of North America. Just want to be clear.