The US just invested more than $1 billion into carbon removal / The move represents a big step in the effort to suck CO2 out of the atmosphere—and slow down climate change.::undefined

  • mrgoodc4t@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 years ago

    Everyone here is mad that we’re doing this as if this is the only thing we’re doing. This… nor any of the other things suggested here… are either/or strategies. They’re all AND strategies.

    People just wanna bitch.

    Celebrate everything that is done to help slow down climate change and encourage more.

            • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              Thought I recognized the name. Last of us reference?

              I think anything that reduces the elites would be effective.

              And just generally forcing people to do better.

              Less costs for those that reuse and a scale for people reducing their landfill rubbish.

              Incentives for public transportation and other forms of transportation.

              Incentives for planting more and reducing concrete use and destruction of native plants.

              Grey water application and solar on all new roofs.

              A complete stop to plastic use for everything would also be helpful. People myself included find it almost impossible to not purchase plastic.

              Bread. Comes in plastic bag. Cheese cucumber all meat products. Crackers in a plastic tray. It’s cheap for supermarkets to use plastic and we pay for cleanup. Move costs to them and they will change to cheaper.

              Cardboard can be broken down and hood for composting.

          • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            That may be possible, but for long term storage of Carbon, Wood is great, just use it as building material or make charcoal from it wich you can store endlessly without the carbon being released again into the wild. Other options would be grain, you could Make alcohol from it, wich stores a lot of Carbon, but that would be a storage problem.

      • htrayl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago
        • Trees last hundreds of years
        • Trees die at differing times
        • Trees are replaced by new trees as they die
        • Trees support additional plant biomass

        Trees are not the solution. The forest is the solution.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is honestly probably more of a transition jobs program for oil workers and something designed to get a few extra votes in Congress. One of the projects is in my state (Louisiana) and the politicians all stressed how it’s creating jobs in the oil producing Southwest part of the state. And the other project is in East Texas. The companies even pinky swore that at least 10% of their workforce would be former oil workers.

  • Cannibal_MoshpitV3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Awesome. But we need more effort to clean up our oceans and reduce the waste and plastic pumped into them by mega corporations.

  • BackupRainDancer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    From an industry standpoint everything the article says at the end as a critique is correct. We should be playing moneyball, those fans that draw in the particles would be an additional toll on the power grid.

    Instead spend the money on removing the emission sources and modernizing our grid/reducing fuel emissions. After weve exhausted low hanging fruit there we’ll have to throw money at offset tech.

    I suppose we’ll have to get the tech made eventually but there’s just so much to be reworked on our grids as is.

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      We’re past the reducing emissions stage.

      We need to BOTH cut emissions, and find a way to pull CO2 out of the atmosphere to get to a healthy planet. Not all the CO2 traps are going to be the right way to do it, but we need to research and figure out how to sustainably pull CO2 out, stop methane emissions, switch to a carbon free grid, and… everything else.

      • BackupRainDancer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        We are not beyond the emissions reduction stage and will not be until the grid is 100% renewable or other emissions free energy powered.

        Switching to clean energy is emissions reduction. Imo should be our #1 priority because we’re not reducing power demand without massive societal change.